Comparative Analysis of Therapeutic Effects in Removing Stone in 584 Cases of Cholelithiasis

doi:10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2001.04.020

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Comparative Analysis of Therapeutic Effects in Removing Stone in 584 Cases of Cholelithiasis

更新时间：2021-11-20

- Comparative Analysis of Therapeutic Effects in Removing Stone in 584 Cases of Cholelithiasis
- Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine Issue 4, Pages: 218-219(2001)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 浙江省天台县人民医院
  2. 浙江省天台县疗养院
  3. 浙江省天台县人民医院浙江省天台县城关劳动路63号,317200
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2001.04.020
  CLC： R259.7
- Published：2001
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
[1]陈伟民,庞晓霞,朱玮华.584例胆囊结石排石疗效对比分析[J].中医杂志,2001(04):218-219+196.

Comparative Analysis of Therapeutic Effects in Removing Stone in 584 Cases of Cholelithiasis[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine2001, (4): 218-219.
[1]陈伟民,庞晓霞,朱玮华.584例胆囊结石排石疗效对比分析[J].中医杂志,2001(04):218-219+196. DOI： 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2001.04.020.

Comparative Analysis of Therapeutic Effects in Removing Stone in 584 Cases of Cholelithiasis[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine2001, (4): 218-219. DOI： 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2001.04.020.

摘要

为探讨胆囊结石的排石疗效

将584例胆囊结石分设西药、中药、中药加推按运经仪综合疗法3组进行对比观察

西药组口服舒胆通、爱活服通片;中药组用自拟方四金排石汤煎服加口服肝胆结石片;综合组煎服四金排石汤加推按运经仪。结果以综合组排石疗效最为显著

其排净率、总排石率、总有效率分别为16.84％、49.27％、84.82％;中药组次之

3项指标分别为11.29％

37.10％

67.7％

西药组疗效最差

3项指标分别为2.44％

7.32％

43.90％。3组间排净率比较差异有显著（P<0.05）

总排石率与总有效率比较差异均有显著性（P<0.01）

表明综合疗法是目前临床治疗横径<1.0cm中小结石的较好方法。

Abstract

581 cases of cholelithiasis were assigned to Western medicine group. Chinese herb group and Combined treatment group. The Western medicine group received oral administration of Trepihutorie

Ai Hou Dan Tong Tablet; The Chinese herb group were orally administrated self - formulated prescription Si Jin Pai Shi Decoction and Gan Dan Jie Shi Tablet; The combined treatment group were orally administrated Si Jin Pai Shi Decoction and received treatment with Tui An Yun Jing Instrument. Results showed that the therapeutic effect in the combined treatment group was the best

the all - stone ejection rate

total lithecbole rate and the total effective rate being ]6. 8’i%i

49. 27%. 84. 82%

respectively; in the Chinese herb group was next

the three indexes being 11. 29%. 37. 10% and 67. 7%

respectively; in the Western medicine group was the worst

the three indexes being 2. 44%

7. 32% and 43. 90%. respectively. There were significantly differences in the all stone ejection rate （P<0. 05）. total lithecbole rate （P <0.01） and the total effective rate （P<0. 01） among the three groups. It is suggested that the combined treatment is a better method for clinical treatment of middle and small stone with transverse diameter less than 1. 0cm at present.

关键词

Keywords

references

查看原文

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

WANG Qingguo's Experience in Treatment of Headache Based on the Concept of "Achieving Harmony by Unblocking and Balancing"

Syndrome Differentiation and Treatment of Cholinergic Urticaria from the Perspective of "Treating Fire Constraint by Dispersing It"

Construction and Application of "Source-Pivot-Convergence" Pattern Identification and Treatment Model for Malignant Tumors

Similarities and Differences between Myofascial Trigger Points and Sinew Knot：from the Perspective of the Channel Sinew Theory

Research on the Correlation Between "Tiangui （天癸）" and Female Reproductive Genetic Diseases

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

Address：No.16, Nanxiao street, Dongzhimen, Dongcheng District, Beijing Postal code：100700
Tel：010-64035632 Email：jtcmcn@188.com
Technical support is provided by Beijing Founder electronics co., LTD 京ICP备09064830号-19 京公网安备11010102007558号
It is recommended to read the content of this site in Chrome&IE9+. Please switch to extreme mode in browser 360.
Cookies We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies.

⁰