The Inventory and Its Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Lumbar Disc Protrusion

ZHANG Zhaojie; ZHANG Shimin; ZHOU Wei; LI Xing; CAO Yanxia; WU Guannan

doi:10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2012.08.031

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

The Inventory and Its Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Lumbar Disc Protrusion

更新时间：2021-11-17

- The Inventory and Its Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Lumbar Disc Protrusion
- Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine Vol. 53, Issue 8, Pages: 661-664(2012)
- 作者机构：
  
  中国中医科学院望京医院
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2012.08.031
  CLC： R681.53
- Published：2012
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
[1]张兆杰,张世民,周卫,李星,曹艳霞,吴冠男.腰椎间盘突出症患者自我报告结局量表研制及其信度、效度分析[J].中医杂志,2012,53(08):661-664.

ZHANG Zhaojie, ZHANG Shimin, ZHOU Wei, et al. The Inventory and Its Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Lumbar Disc Protrusion[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine2012, 53(8): 661-664.
[1]张兆杰,张世民,周卫,李星,曹艳霞,吴冠男.腰椎间盘突出症患者自我报告结局量表研制及其信度、效度分析[J].中医杂志,2012,53(08):661-664. DOI： 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2012.08.031.

ZHANG Zhaojie, ZHANG Shimin, ZHOU Wei, et al. The Inventory and Its Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Lumbar Disc Protrusion[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine2012, 53(8): 661-664. DOI： 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2012.08.031.

摘要

目的编制腰椎间盘突出症患者自我报告结局量表并对其进行信度及效度分析。方法通过开放式访谈、研究小组反复讨论制定腰椎间盘突出症自觉症状自评初步问卷

并对100份有效问卷进行信度、效度分析。信度分析主要采用克朗巴赫α系数、split-a系数

效度分析主要采用主成分因子分析。结果腰椎间盘突出症患者自我报告结局量表总体克朗巴赫α系数为0.871

split-a系数为0.823;该量表KMO统计量为0.805

巴特利特球度检测观测值为918.917

主成分因子分析方法提取特征根值>1的4个公因子

累计贡献率为66.476%。结论基于腰椎间盘突出症患者自我报告的量表具有较高的信度和效度。

Abstract

Objective To formulate the patient-reported outcome（PRO） scale for lumbar disc protrusion（LDP） and analyze its reliability and validity.Methods The subjective symptom questionnaire was formulated and the reliability and validity of 100 questionnaires were analyzed by Cronbach’s α

split-α and principal constituent factor analysis.Results The total Cronbach’s α and split-α of the scale was 0.871 and 0.823 respectively.The value of Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin（KMO） and Bartlett test of sphericity was 0.805 and 918.917 respectively.According to factor analysis

the accumulative contribution rate of four common factors those eigenvalue exceeded 1 was 66.476%.Conclusion The PRO scalefor LDP has a higher reliability and validity.

关键词

Keywords

references

查看原文

Views

373

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Development and Application of the Evidence Quality Rating Scale for Ancient Classical Prescriptions in Traditional Chinese Medicine

Evaluation of Reliability,Validity and Responsiveness of Clinical Efficacy Scale of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndromes of Infantile Anorexia（ Feeding Disorder）

Analyses on Reliability and Validity of the Evaluation Scale of Patient-Reported-Outcome Based on the Windstroke Patients with Spastic Paralysis

Chinese Translation of the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale and Its Application Evaluation on Traditional Chinese Medicine for Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Liver-Constraint and Spleen-Deficiency Syndrome

Validity and Reliability Test of Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnostic Scale for Liver Constraint and Qi Stagnation Syndrome of Breast Fibroadenoma

Related Author

ZHANG Juwen

LIU Jianping

SU Xiangfei

WEI Wei

SU Xiaolan

FENG Xue

YU Fanya

ZHANG Xudong

Related Institution

Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine， Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

China Association of Chinese Medicine

Wangjing Hospital， China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of TCM

Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Address：No.16, Nanxiao street, Dongzhimen, Dongcheng District, Beijing Postal code：100700
Tel：010-64035632 Email：jtcmcn@188.com
Technical support is provided by Beijing Founder electronics co., LTD 京ICP备09064830号-19 京公网安备11010102007558号
It is recommended to read the content of this site in Chrome&IE9+. Please switch to extreme mode in browser 360.
Cookies We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies.

⁰