Objective To observe clinical curative effect of different Chinese medicine intervening models in older patients with angina pectoris.Methods Totally 164 older patients with angina pectoris of Qi deficiency and blood stasis syndrome and Qi stagnation and blood stasis syndrome were randomly divided into a treatment based on syndrome differentiation group and a conventional treatment based on disease differentiation group

with 82 cases in each.In the treatment based on syndrome differentiation group

in addition to conventional treatment of western medicine

patient of Qi deficiency and blood stasis syndrome were given 0.9 g of Qishen Yiqi Droplet（ 芪参益气滴丸） orally

and patients of Qi stagnation and blood stasis syndrome were given 0.27 g of Compound Danshen Dripping Pills（ 复方丹参滴丸） orally

three times per day.the common treatment based on disease differentiation group was all given 9 g of Huoxue Baoxin Pill（ 活血保心丸） orally

twice per day.Two groups were both treated for 4 weeks.Before and after treatment

Seattle Angina Questionnaire（ SAQ） was adopted to evaluate quality of life.Syndrome scores were recorded before treatment and at 2 or 4 weeks after treatment.Clinical curative effects were evaluated after treatment.Results The total clinical curative effect in the treatment based on syndrome differentiation group was 84.15%

which was significantly higher than 60.98% in the common treatment based on disease differentiation group（ P <0.05）.And the curative effect rates in patients of Qi deficiency and blood stasis syndrome and Qi stagnation and blood stasis syndrome in the treatment based on syndrome differentiation group were all superior to those of the corresponding syndromes in the common treatment based on disease differentiation group（ P < 0.05 or P < 0.01）.Physical limitation degree

angina condition score and total score in SAQ in the treatment based on syndrome differentiation group were all higher than those in the common treatment based on disease differentiation group（ P < 0.05 or P <0.01）.After 4-week treatment

symptom scores in the two groups both significantly decreased compared with those before treatment

and the symptom scores in the treatment based on syndrome differentiation group were lower than those in the common treatment based on disease differentiation group（ P < 0.05）.Conclusion In treating aged angina pectoris

compared with the common treatment based on disease differentiation model

treatment based on syndrome differentiation model could better improve symptoms of angina and quality of life.