Establishing a Screening and Evaluation System for Appropriate Technology of Traditional Chinese Medicine:Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

WANG Dan; CHE Wenwen; QIU Jiwen; YAN Lijuan; GUO Yi; GUO Yongming

doi:10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2019.17.008

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Establishing a Screening and Evaluation System for Appropriate Technology of Traditional Chinese Medicine:Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

更新时间：2021-11-10

- Establishing a Screening and Evaluation System for Appropriate Technology of Traditional Chinese Medicine:Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process
- Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine Vol. 60, Issue 17, Pages: 1468-1472(2019)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 天津中医药大学针灸推拿学院
  2. 天津中医药大学中医学院
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2019.17.008
  CLC： R24
- Published：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
[1]王丹,车文文,邱继文,阎丽娟,郭义,郭永明.基于层次分析法建立中医适宜技术筛选评价体系[J].中医杂志,2019,60(17):1468-1472.

WANG Dan, CHE Wenwen, QIU Jiwen, et al. Establishing a Screening and Evaluation System for Appropriate Technology of Traditional Chinese Medicine:Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine2019, 60(17): 1468-1472.
[1]王丹,车文文,邱继文,阎丽娟,郭义,郭永明.基于层次分析法建立中医适宜技术筛选评价体系[J].中医杂志,2019,60(17):1468-1472. DOI： 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2019.17.008.

WANG Dan, CHE Wenwen, QIU Jiwen, et al. Establishing a Screening and Evaluation System for Appropriate Technology of Traditional Chinese Medicine:Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine2019, 60(17): 1468-1472. DOI： 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2019.17.008.

摘要

目的探索一种适合评价中医适宜技术的评价指标体系及评分体系。方法遵循系统性、独立性、可比性、动态性原则

通过文献检索和专家会议讨论确定评价指标和各指标内涵。采用层次分析法

通过建立层次指标比较判断矩阵确定各指标权重

并对指标权重进行一致性检验

在此基础上计算二级指标权重

得出完整的指标权重。最终由专家确定各指标评分标准

建立完整的中医适宜技术筛选评价体系。结果筛选出有效性、安全性、技术性、经济性、适宜性5个一级指标和简易性、技能要求、成熟度、规范程度、设备要求、效力、效果、不良反应率、不良反应强度、机构成本、患者成本、适宜推广、医生接受性、伦理接受性、患者接受性、机构接受性、发病率17个二级指标

并明确各指标内涵。计算出一级指标、二级指标各自的权重及二级指标的组合权重

一级指标的权重分别为有效性0. 40、安全性0. 30、技术性0. 08、经济性0. 15、适宜性0. 07

并对每项指标分别确立1～5分的评分标准。结论构建了包括有效性、安全性、技术性、经济性、适宜性5个一级指标和17个二级指标的中医适宜技术筛选评价体系

并制定了指标权重和具体评分标准。

Abstract

Objective To explore an evaluation index system and scoring system suitable for evaluating appropriate techniques of traditional Chinese medicine（ TCM）. Methods Following the principles of systemicity

independence

comparability and dynamics

the evaluation indicators and the connotations of each index were determined through literature search and expert meeting discussions. Using the analytic hierarchy process

the weights of each index were determined by establishing a hierarchical index comparison judgment matrix

and the consistency of the index weights is tested. On this basis

the weights of the second-level indicators were calculated

and the complete index weights were obtained. Finally

experts determined the scoring standards for each indicator and established a complete screening and evaluation system for TCM appropriate techniques. Results Totally 5 first-level indicators of effectiveness

safety

technicality

economy and suitability and 17 second-level indictors of simplicity

skill requirements

maturity

standardization level

equipment requirements

efficacy

effectiveness

adverse reaction rate

adverse reaction intensity

organization cost

patient cost

appropriate promotion

doctor acceptance

ethical acceptance

patient acceptance

institutional acceptance and morbidity were screened out

and the connotation of each indicator was clarified. The weight of each of the first-level and second-level indicators and the combined weight of the second-level indicators were calculated. The weights of the first-level indicators were 0. 40 for effectiveness

0. 30 for safety

0. 08 for technicality

0. 15 for economy

and 0. 07 for suitability. The indicators were given a scoring standard of 1 to 5 points. Conclusion A screening and evaluation system for TCM appropriate technology including 5 first-level indicators of effectiveness

safety

technicality

economy and suitability and 17 second-level indicators is constructed

and the weights of indicators and specific scoring standards are formulated.

关键词

Keywords

references

查看原文

Views

528

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Construction of an Evaluation System for Traditional Chinese Medicine Appropriate Technologies Based on Evidence-Based Medicine

Construction of Multidimensional Evaluation System for Health Status in Modern China's Ideal Life

Selection and Weight Determination of Diagnostic Items for Qi Stagnation Syndrome Based on Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process

Problems and Thinking on the Methods for Establishing the Effectiveness Evaluation Index System of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Preliminary Construction of Evaluation Index System for Traditional Chinese Medicine Medicated Diet based on Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process

Related Author

JI Conghua

ZHOU Zhizhen

MA Dieyu

LIN Sisi

ZHOU Zhiyi

WANG Jixing

WANG Yongyan

WANG Zhong

Related Institution

School of Public Health，Zhejiang Chinese Medical University

The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University

Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine，China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

School of Basic Medical Sciences，Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine

Institute of Chinese Medicine Diagnosis，Hunan University of Chinese Medicine

Address：No.16, Nanxiao street, Dongzhimen, Dongcheng District, Beijing Postal code：100700
Tel：010-64035632 Email：jtcmcn@188.com
Technical support is provided by Beijing Founder electronics co., LTD 京ICP备09064830号-19 京公网安备11010102007558号
It is recommended to read the content of this site in Chrome&IE9+. Please switch to extreme mode in browser 360.
Cookies We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies.

⁰