YAO Yuning, CAO Kegang, TUO tuo, et al. Construction of Evidence Grading and Recommendation System for Ancient Chinese Medicine Books through Experts Questionnaire Survey[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine2021, 62(7): 572-576.
YAO Yuning, CAO Kegang, TUO tuo, et al. Construction of Evidence Grading and Recommendation System for Ancient Chinese Medicine Books through Experts Questionnaire Survey[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine2021, 62(7): 572-576.DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2021.07.005.
Construction of Evidence Grading and Recommendation System for Ancient Chinese Medicine Books through Experts Questionnaire Survey
Objective To develop the ancient evidence grading and recommendation system for adopting evidence from traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) ancient books in developing clinical practice guidelines. Methods A questionnaire was designed to explore the evaluation standards of ancient TCM books
ancient evidence grading
and ancient evidence recommendation. Experts in TCM
integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine
and TCM medical history document were surveyed. Each item score and their weights were calculated after consistency and importance evaluation analysis. After reaching the experts consensus
the ancient evidence grading and recommendation system was finally formulated. Results Thirty questionnaires were sent and returned; and the response rate was 100%. The evaluation of ancient TCM books included cited situation and author items; Cited situation item had four sub-items including catalog cited
abstract cited
book cited and book series cited
each with a full score of 5 points
while author item classified the documents into official or famous authors level
well-known authors level
and general authors level
each rated as 5
3 and 1 point. The ancient evidence grading standard included two items: evidence background and evidence evaluation; evidence background focused on literature background and citation
while evidence evaluation included patient self-evaluation
medical evaluation and evaluations of other related personnel
each with a five-point full score; the score of evidence background and that of evidence evaluation were summed up as the score of ancient evidence score
which was graded into different levels with thresholds of 4 and 7 points. Accordingly
the evidence recommendation standards were formulated
which were strongly recommended(level Ⅰ
≥7 and ≤10 points)
weakly recommended(level Ⅱ
≥4 and <7 points)
unclearly recommended(level Ⅲ
>0 and <4 points) and not recommended(level Ⅲ
0 points). Conclusion The ancient evidence grading and re-commendation system is developed by clearly defining the standards of ancient TCM books
ancient evidence grading
and ancient evidence recommendation
which can be used to adopt evidence from ancient books in developing TCM clinical practice guidelines