

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.中国中医科学院西苑医院消化病研究所,北京市海淀区西苑操场1号,100091
2.中国中医科学院研究生院
Received:02 June 2023,
Revised:2023-10-11,
Published:02 March 2024
移动端阅览
黄开月,黄金科,王凤云等.中医药治疗功能性消化不良临床试验中的中药安慰剂效应Meta分析[J].中医杂志,2024,65(05):479-488.
HUANG Kaiyue,HUANG Jinke,WANG Fengyun,et al.Meta-Analysis of the Placebo Effect of Chinese Herbal Medicine in Clinical Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Functional Dyspepsia[J].Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2024,65(05):479-488.
黄开月,黄金科,王凤云等.中医药治疗功能性消化不良临床试验中的中药安慰剂效应Meta分析[J].中医杂志,2024,65(05):479-488. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2024.05.008.
HUANG Kaiyue,HUANG Jinke,WANG Fengyun,et al.Meta-Analysis of the Placebo Effect of Chinese Herbal Medicine in Clinical Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Functional Dyspepsia[J].Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2024,65(05):479-488. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2024.05.008.
目的
2
分析中医药治疗功能性消化不良(FD)随机对照试验(RCTs)中的中药安慰剂实施现状并系统评价其安慰剂效应。
方法
2
利用医学主题词和自由词组合检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国知网、万方数据库收录的1994年1月31至2023年9月30日发表的设有中药安慰剂组治疗FD的RCTs,分析其剂型、成分及评价方法现状,通过Cochrane偏倚风险评估标准评价文献质量,对FD患者的中药安慰剂应答率进行单组率Meta分析,并根据诊断标准、疗效标准、治疗时间、安慰剂剂型、是否含有活性成分及是否行安慰剂评估进行亚组分析和Meta回归分析。
结果
2
纳入34篇文献,共5046例患者,其中2221例FD患者接受了中药安慰剂治疗。颗粒剂为最主要的安慰剂剂型,占71%(24/34),32.35%(11/34)研究的安慰剂添加了原药,只有12项(35%)研究对外观、气味、味道都进行了描述。安慰剂组FD患者安慰剂应答率为41%(95%
CI
:0.35~0.47;
P
<0.01,
I
2
=87%);不同诊断标准、不同治疗时间的组间差异有统计学意义(
P
<0.05),但不同疗效评价标准、不同安慰剂剂型、是否含有低剂量活性成分、是否进行安慰剂评估的组间差异无统计学意义(
P
>0.05)。
结论
2
FD患者存在明显的中药安慰剂效应,颗粒剂为主要的安慰剂剂型,不同诊断标准、不同治疗时间可能会影响患者的应答率,中药安慰剂中加入低剂量原药未见对应答率具有影响。临床试验者对安慰剂的关注度还不够,中药安慰剂的制作和评价缺乏统一的标准和规范性。
Objective
2
To analyse the current implementation status of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) placebo and systematically evaluate the placebo effect in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for the treatment of functional dyspepsia (FD).
Methods
2
A combination of medical subject terms and free words was used to search six databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang, for RCTs with CHM placebo group for FD published from January 31st, 1994 to September 30th, 2023. The dosage forms, composition, and methodological quality were collected and evaluated. The quality of the included articles was evaluated by Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, and meta-analysis was performed on the CHM placebo response rate of patients with FD, and subgroup analysis and meta-regression was performed according to diagnostic criteria, efficacy criteria, duration of treatment, type of placebo, whether it contained active ingredient, and whether it evaluated placebo effects.
Results
2
A total of 34 publications were included involving 5046 participants, of which 2221 FD patients received CHM placebo treatment. Granules were the predominant placebo preparation, accounting for 71% (24/34); 32.35% (11/34) of the studies added real CHM to the placebo, and only 12 (35%) of the studies described appearance, odour, and taste. The placebo response rate in FD patients in the placebo group was 41% (95%
CI
: 0.35 to 0.47;
P
<0.01,
I
2
= 87%); there was significant difference between groups with different diagnostic criteria and different treatment durations (
P
<0.05 or
P
<0.01), but there was no significant difference between the different efficacy evaluation criteria, the different placebo preparation, the presence of a low-dose active ingredient, and the presence or absence of placebo assessment (
P
>0.05).
Conclusion
2
There was a significant CHM placebo effect in patients with FD, with granules as the main preparation of placebop. Different diagnostic criteria and different treatment times may affect the response rate of patients, and the addition of low-dose real medicine to the CHM placebos has not been seen to have an effect on the response rate. Clinical investigators have not paid enough attention to placebos, and there is a lack of uniform standards and norms for the preparation and evaluation of CHM placebos.
中华医学会消化病学分会胃肠动力学组 , 中华医学会消化病学分会胃肠功能性疾病协作组 . 中国功能性消化不良专家共识意见(2015年,上海) [J]. 中华消化杂志 , 2016 , 36 ( 4 ): 217 - 229 .
SPERBER AD , BANGDIWALA SI , DROSSMAN DA , et al . Worldwide prevalence and burden of functional gastrointestinal disorders, results of rome foundation global study [J] . Gastroenterology , 2021 , 160 ( 1 ): 99 - 114 .
吴柏瑶 , 张法灿 , 梁列新 . 功能性消化不良的流行病学 [J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志 , 2013 , 22 ( 1 ): 85 - 90 .
TACK J , MASUY I , VAN DEN HOUTE K , et al . Drugs under development for the treatment of functional dyspepsia and related disorders [J]. Expert Opin Investig Drugs , 2019 , 28 ( 10 ): 871 - 889 .
卢小芳 , 张声生 . 中医药治疗功能性消化不良研究进展 [J]. 中国中西医结合消化杂志 , 2023 , 31 ( 6 ): 405 - 410 .
HO L , ZHONG CCW , WONG CHL , et al . Chinese herbal medicine for functional dyspepsia: a network meta-analysis of prokinetic-controlled randomised trials [J]. Chin Med , 2021 , 16 ( 1 ): 140 .
ENCK P , KLOSTERHALFEN S . Placebo responses and placebo effects in functional gastrointestinal disorders [J]. Front Psychiatry , 2020 , 11 : 797 . doi: 10.3389/fpsyt. 2020.00797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00797 .
HUANG X , OSHIMA T , TOMITA T , et al . Meta-analysis: placebo response and its determinants in functional dyspepsia [J]. Am J Gastroenterol , 2021 , 116 ( 11 ): 2184 - 2196 .
FORD AC , MOAYYEDI P . Meta-analysis: factors affecting placebo response rate in the irritable bowel syndrome [J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther , 2010 , 32 ( 2 ): 144 - 158 .
NEE J , SUGARMAN M A , BALLOU S , et al . Placebo response in chronic idiopathic constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Am J Gastroenterol , 2019 , 114 ( 12 ): 1838 - 1846 .
HIGGINS JP , ALTMAN DG , GØTZSCHE PC , et al . Cochrane bias methods group; cochrane statistical methods group. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials [J]. BMJ , 2011 , 343 : d5928 . doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928 .
石修权 , 王增珍 . Egger's test与Begg's test的功效差异比较与原因分析 [J]. 华中科技大学学报(医学版) , 2009 , 38 ( 1 ): 91 - 93,102 .
梁士兵 , 刘建平 , 柴倩云 , 等 . 中医药系统综述与Meta分析中异质性来源与处理:Meta回归在中医药领域的应用 [J]. 中医杂志 , 2022 , 63 ( 8 ): 739 - 744 .
BRADEN B , CASPARY W , BöRNER N , et al . Clinical effects of STW 5 (Iberogast ® ) are not based on acceleration of gastric emptying in patients with functional dyspepsia and gastroparesis [J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil , 2009 , 21 ( 6 ): 632 - 638, e 25 .
CHEN G , FENG P , WANG S , et al . An herbal formulation of Jiawei Xiaoyao for the treatment of functional dyspepsia: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial [J]. Clin Transl Gastroenterol , 2020 , 11 ( 10 ): e00241 .
DU HG , MING L , CHEN SJ , et al . Xiaoyao pill for treatment of functional dyspepsia in perimenopausal women with depression [J]. World J Gastroenterol , 2014 , 20 ( 44 ): 16739 - 16744 .
范明明 , 常雨 , 张艮霜 , 等 . 柴术理胃饮治疗功能性消化不良肝胃不和证伴焦虑抑郁临床研究 [J]. 中国中医药信息杂志 , 2023 , 30 ( 6 ): 153 - 157 .
高山青 , 温红珠 , 卞慧 , 等 . 李东垣消痞丸治疗难治性功能性消化不良餐后不适综合征33例 [J]. 陕西中医药大学学报 , 2020 , 43 ( 3 ): 62 - 68 .
胡学军 , 黄穗平 , 张海燕 . 健脾理气方治疗脾虚气滞型功能性消化不良的临床研究 [J]. 中医药导报 , 2011 , 17 ( 12 ): 27 - 29 .
KO SJ , PARK JW , LEE JH , et al . An herbal medicine, yukgunja-tang is more effective in a type of functional dyspepsia categorized by facial shape diagnosis: A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial [J]. Evid-based Complement Altern Med , 2018 , 2018 : 8546357 . doi: 10. 1155/2018/8546357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8546357 .
李娟娟 , 王凤云 , 梁旭 , 等 . 香砂六君子颗粒治疗功能性消化不良脾虚证的随机、双盲、对照研究 [J]. 中国中西医结合消化杂志 , 2022 , 30 ( 4 ): 250 - 254 .
李培菡 , 唐禹 , 温红珠 , 等 . 消痞止痛方治疗脾虚气滞证功能性消化不良的随机、双盲、对照研究 [J]. 中国中西医结合消化杂志 , 2022 , 30 ( 4 ): 245 - 249,254 .
李晓玥 , 程军 , 李慧 , 等 . 和胃汤加减治疗功能性消化不良肝胃不和证的临床观察 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2021 , 27 ( 22 ): 113 - 118 .
刘亚军 , 沈洪 , 崔月萍 , 等 . 辨证治疗功能性消化不良50例临床研究 [J]. 江苏中医药 , 2015 , 47 ( 10 ): 41 - 43 .
ZHAO LQ , ZHANG SS , WANG ZF , et al . Efficacy of modified ban xia xie xin decoction on functional dyspepsia of cold and heat in complexity syndrome: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med , 2013 , 2013 : 812143 . doi: 10.1155/2013/812143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/812143 .
LV L , WANG FY , MA XX , et al . Efficacy and safety of Xiangsha Liujunzi granules for functional dyspepsia: a multi-center randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical study [J]. World J Gastroenterol , 2017 , 23 ( 30 ): 5589 - 5601 .
吕冉 , 王微 , 刘丽娟 , 等 . 柴胡疏肝散加减对肝胃气滞型功能性消化不良的症状、焦虑抑郁以及核素胃排空的影响 [J]. 中华中医药杂志 , 2022 , 37 ( 3 ): 1815 - 1818 .
MADISCH A , HOLTMANN G , MAYR G , et al . Treatment of functional dyspepsia with a herbal preparation: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial [J]. Digestion , 2004 , 69 ( 1 ): 45 - 52 .
潘洋 , 巩淑萍 , 党红晨 . 甘海胃康胶囊治疗脾虚气滞型功能性消化不良的临床效果观察 [J]. 临床消化病杂志 , 2023 , 35 ( 3 ): 232 - 234 .
曲英迪 , 吴珊珊 , 张宁怡 , 等 . 荜铃胃痛颗粒治疗大学生功能性消化不良上腹痛综合征的临床观察 [J]. 世界中西医结合杂志 , 2022 , 17 ( 1 ): 131 - 136 .
苏青 , 涂蕾 , 贾小红 , 等 . 气滞胃痛颗粒治疗功能性消化不良患者随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床研究 [J]. 临床消化病杂志 , 2016 , 28 ( 4 ): 216 - 219 .
SU Q , CHEN SL , WANG HH , et al . A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial of qi-zhi-wei-tong granules on postprandial distress syndrome-predominant functional dyspepsia [J]. Chin Med J (Engl) , 2018 , 131 ( 13 ): 1549 - 1556 .
SUZUKI H , MATSUZAKI J , FUKUSHIMA Y , et al . Randomized clinical trial: rikkunshito in the treatment of functional dyspepsia-a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study [J]. Neurogastroenterology and motility , 2014 , 26 ( 7 ): 950 - 961 .
VINSON B , HOLTMANN G . DDW ® 2022:BEST OF DGVS [C]. San Diego : Gastroenterology , 2022 , 162 ( 7 ): S-69.
VON ARNIM U , PEITZ U , VINSON B , et al . STW 5, a phytopharmacon for patients with functional dyspepsia: Results of a multicenter, placebo-controlled double-blind study [J]. Am J Gastroenterol , 2007 , 102 ( 6 ): 1268 - 1275 .
汪红兵 , 张声生 , 沈洪 , 等 . 胃病3号复方治疗功能性消化不良脾胃湿热证多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验研究 [J]. 中国中西医结合消化杂志 2011 , 19 ( 5 ): 284 - 289 .
王蓓 , 苏晓兰 , 张晓红 , 等 . 辛开苦降法治疗功能性消化不良的效果与安全性评价 [J]. 中国医药导报 , 2016 , 13 ( 25 ): 112 - 117 .
WEN YD , LU F , ZHAO YP , et al . Epigastric pain syndrome: what can traditional Chinese medicine do? A randomized controlled trial of Biling Weitong Granules [J]. World J Gastroenterol , 2020 , 26 ( 28 ): 4170 - 4181 .
吴兵 , 沈晨 , 陶琳 , 等 . 参香健脾理气颗粒治疗脾虚气滞证功能性消化不良随机双盲对照研究 [J]. 中国中西医结合消化杂志 , 2023 , 31 ( 6 ): 429 - 433 .
夏立营 , 王朝阳 , 刘维佳 , 等 . 畅胃颗粒治疗功能性消化不良56例 [J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志 , 2008 , 14 ( 6 ): 447 - 448 .
许卫华 , 姚树坤 , 李妮娇 , 等 . 功能性消化不良中医辨证论治的临床疗效观察 [J]. 中国中西医结合消化杂志 , 2013 , 21 ( 5 ): 225 - 228 .
XIAO Y , LI Y , SHU J , et al . The efficacy of oral zhizhu kuanzhong, an herbal traditional Chinese medicine, in patients with postprandial distress syndrome: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial [J]. Gastroenterol , 2017 , 152 ( 5 ): S168 - S169 .
ZHANG SS , ZHAO LQ , WANG HB , et al . Efficacy of Gastrosis No.1 compound on functional dyspepsia of spleen and stomach deficiency-cold syndrome: a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial [J]. Chin J Integr Med , 2013 , 19 ( 7 ): 498 - 504 .
ZHAO L , GAN AP . Clinical and psychological assessment on xinwei decoction for treating functional dyspepsia accompanied with depression and anxiety [J]. Am J Chin Med , 2005 , 33 ( 2 ): 249 - 257 .
赵鲁卿 , 张声生 , 卢小芳 . 胃病2号对功能性消化不良脾虚气滞证患者生活质量影响的研究 [J]. 中国中西医结合消化杂志 , 2017 , 25 ( 12 ): 948 - 951 .
钟恒 . 中医健脾法治疗痞满临床与实验观察 [J]. 泰山医学院学报 , 2016 , 37 ( 6 ): 697 - 698 .
曾彦博 , 杜奕奇 , 潘洋 , 等 . 甘海胃康胶囊治疗功能性消化不良的前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床研究 [J]. 中华消化杂志 , 2022 , 42 ( 8 ): 557 - 564 .
ENCK P , KLOSTERHALFEN S . Placebos and the placebo 3ffect in drug trials [J]. Handb Exp Pharmacol , 2019 , 260 : 399 - 431 . doi: 10.1007/164_2019_269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/164_2019_269 .
JAKOVLJEVIC M . The placebo-nocebo response: controversies and challenges from clinical and research perspective [J]. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol , 2014 , 24 ( 3 ): 333 - 341 .
0
Views
2
下载量
1
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010102007558号