An Approach for Grading Syndrome Suitability of Dietary Therapy in Traditional Chinese Medicine

YUAN Lixia; CHEN Jianrong; YUAN Xunxun; XU Sheng; ZHU Weifeng; ZHOU Xu

doi:10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2024.18.008

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

An Approach for Grading Syndrome Suitability of Dietary Therapy in Traditional Chinese Medicine

更新时间：2024-09-11

- An Approach for Grading Syndrome Suitability of Dietary Therapy in Traditional Chinese Medicine
- Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine Vol. 65, Issue 18, Pages: 1888-1894(2024)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.江西中医药大学循证医学研究中心，江西省南昌市新建区梅岭大道1688号，330004
  2.南昌大学第一附属医院
  3.靶向药物与释药系统四川省重点实验室
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2024.18.008
  CLC：
- Received：07 February 2024，
  
  Revised：2024-05-07，
  
  Published：17 September 2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
袁丽霞,陈建蓉,袁浔浔等.中医食疗证型适用性的证据分级方法构建[J].中医杂志,2024,65(18):1888-1894.

YUAN Lixia,CHEN Jianrong,YUAN Xunxun,et al.An Approach for Grading Syndrome Suitability of Dietary Therapy in Traditional Chinese Medicine[J].Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2024,65(18):1888-1894.
袁丽霞,陈建蓉,袁浔浔等.中医食疗证型适用性的证据分级方法构建[J].中医杂志,2024,65(18):1888-1894. DOI： 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2024.18.008.

YUAN Lixia,CHEN Jianrong,YUAN Xunxun,et al.An Approach for Grading Syndrome Suitability of Dietary Therapy in Traditional Chinese Medicine[J].Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2024,65(18):1888-1894. DOI： 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2024.18.008.

摘要

明确中医食疗方案对不同证型的适用性（适用或忌用）是中医食疗合理应用和安全性的保障。构建了一套综合考虑古籍、现代研究和专家经验证据的中医食疗证型适用性分级系统（GRADE-SSD）。GRADE-SSD根据当前可得最高质量证据，将中医食疗对各中医证型的适用性分为2类4级：“确定”适用/忌用（A级）、“很可能”适用/忌用（B级）、“可能”适用/忌用（C级）、证据不足无法确定（D级）。应用时，首先系统检索当前可用的古籍和临床研究证据，针对不同证据（中医古籍、随机对照试验、观察性研究和meta分析）采用规定工具评价证据质量，再以质量“就高”原则确定食疗的中医证型适用性级别。若缺乏直接证据，GRADE-SSD支持基于“类方”间接证据的降级评价。当缺乏古籍和临床研究时，可采用GRADE-SSD方案评价行业共识或专家意见证据质量，用于食疗的中医证型适用性级别。基于中医食疗对安全性的要求，当“适用”和“忌用”证据同时存在时应考虑为“忌用”证据。GRADE-SSD还提供了基于未来新证据的证据确定性更新方案。GRADE-SSD评价结果可为中医食疗临床试验设置纳入/排除标准和食疗产品标签中声明各证型适用性提供依据。

Abstract

Clarifying the applicability （indications or contraindications） of traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） dietary regimens to different syndromes is a guarantee for the rational application and safety of TCM dietary therapy. By considering evidence from ancient literature， modern research and experts' experience， the Grading System for Syndrome Suitability of Dietary Therapy in TCM （GRADE-SSD） has been constructed. According to the currently available highest-quality evidence， GRADE-SSD classified the applicability of TCM dietary therapy to various TCM syndromes into 2 categories and 4 grades： "definitely" applicable/contradicted （Grade A）， "very likely" applicable/contradicted （Grade B）， "possibly" applicable/contradicted （Grade C）， and insufficient evidence to determine （Grade D）. When applying， first， systematically search the currently available ancient books and clinical research evidence. For different types of evidence （ancient TCM books， randomized controlled trials， observational studies， and meta-analyses）， use the prescribed tools to evaluate the quality of the evidence， and then determine the applicability level of TCM syndromes of dietary therapy based on the principle of "taking the highest" quality. If there is a lack of direct evidence， GRADE-SSD supports a downgraded evaluation based on indirect evidence of "similar prescriptions". When there is a lack of ancient books and clinical research， the GRADE-SSD plan can evaluate the quality of evidence from peer consensus or expert opinions for the applicability level of TCM syndromes of dietary therapy. Based on the requirements for the safety of TCM dietary therapy， when there is both "applicable" and "contradicted" evidence， it should be considered as "contradicted" evidence. GRADE-SSD also provides an evidence certainty update plan based on new evidence in the future. The evaluation results of GRADE-SSD can provide a basis for setting inclusion/exclusion criteria in clinical trials of TCM dietary therapy and stating the applicability of each syndrome in the labels of dietary therapy products.

关键词

Keywords

references

吕露阳，张志锋，王庆颖，等 . 全草类药食同源中药安全性评价研究进展［J］. 中草药， 2021 ， 52 （ 15 ）： 4722 - 4730 .

吴玲，郑琴，张科楠，等 . 木部类、果部类和草部类药食同源中药安全性评价研究进展［J］. 中草药， 2019 ， 50 （ 10 ）： 2505 - 2512 .

GUYATT GH ， OXMAN AD ， VIST GE ， et al . GRADE： an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations ［J］. BMJ ， 2008 ， 336 （ 7650 ）： 924 - 926 .

国家卫生计生委办公厅 . 国家卫生计生委办公厅关于征求《按照传统既是食品又是中药材物质目录管理办法》（征求意见稿）意见的函［EB/OL］. （ 2014-11-06 ）［ 2024-02-01 ］. http：//www.nhc.gov.cn/cms-search/xxgk/getManuscriptXxgk.htm？id=67ac54fb05ed46929adc63f2db31d4bf http://www.nhc.gov.cn/cms-search/xxgk/getManuscriptXxgk.htm?id=67ac54fb05ed46929adc63f2db31d4bf .

国家中医药管理局 . 中医内科病证诊断疗效标准：ZY/T 001 . 1 - 1994 ［EB/OL］.（ 1994-06-28 ）［ 2024-01-01 ］. http：//standards.ccebtcm.org.cn/Home/StandardType3Info？StandardId=b9dd7aeb-4e8f-484b-842d-ede82e752ddf http://standards.ccebtcm.org.cn/Home/StandardType3Info?StandardId=b9dd7aeb-4e8f-484b-842d-ede82e752ddf

衷敬柏 . 建立适合中医临床诊疗证据评价方法的建议［J］. 中华中医药杂志， 2016 ， 31 （ 4 ）： 1146 - 1148 .

张磊 . 中医古籍防治证据评价分级量表的研制及应用［D］. 北京：中国中医科学院， 2019 .

ZHANG L ， GUO X ， YANG S ， et al . Application of the delphi method in the construction of an evaluating and grading scale for evidence of disease prevention and treatment in ancient books of traditional Chinese medicine ［J］. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ， 2022 ， 2022 ： 3674663 . doi： 10.1155/2022/3674663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3674663 .

STERNE JAC ， SAVOVIĆ J ， PAGE MJ ， et al . RoB 2： a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials ［J］. BMJ ， 2019 ， 366 ： l4898 . doi： 10.1136/bmj.l4898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898 .

COLES B ， TYRER F ， HUSSEIN H ， et al . Development， content validation， and reliability of the Assessment of Real-World Observational Studies （ArRoWS） critical appraisal tool ［J］. Ann Epidemiol ， 2021 ， 55 ： 57 - 63.e15 . doi： 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.09.014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.09.014 .

SHEA BJ ， REEVES BC ， WELLS G ， et al . AMSTAR 2： a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions， or both ［J］. BMJ ， 2017 ， 358 ： j4008 . doi： 10.1136/bmj.j4008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008 .

WETTERSLEV J ， JAKOBSEN JC ， GLUUD C . Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis ［J］. BMC Med Res Methodol ， 2017 ， 17 （ 1 ）： 39 .

杨叔禹 . 国家糖尿病基层中医防治管理指南（2022）［J］. 中医杂志， 2022 ， 63 （ 24 ）： 2397 - 2414 .

查看原文

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Modern Expanded Application of Ancient Classic Formulae from the Perspective of Syndrome‑Formula Ontology Reconstruction

Construction of Evidence Grading and Recommendation System for Ancient Chinese Medicine Books through Experts Questionnaire Survey

Similarities and Differences between Myofascial Trigger Points and Sinew Knot：from the Perspective of the Channel Sinew Theory

The Philosophy and Practical Pathway of "Dao （道）-Shen （神）-Formula" in Traditional Chinese Medicine

Exploration on the Connotation and Application of the Three Aspects of "Dietary Inquiry" for "Appetite" "Eating Capacity" "Food Preference"

Related Author

WANG Guibin

LIN Sijie

LIU Zihan

PANG Bo

YAO Yuning

CAO Kegang

TUO tuo

WANG Fenglan

Related Institution

Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine

Xiyuan Hospital，China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Dongzhimen Hospital,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Address：No.16, Nanxiao street, Dongzhimen, Dongcheng District, Beijing Postal code：100700
Tel：010-64035632 Email：jtcmcn@188.com
Technical support is provided by Beijing Founder electronics co., LTD 京ICP备09064830号-19 京公网安备11010102007558号
It is recommended to read the content of this site in Chrome&IE9+. Please switch to extreme mode in browser 360.
Cookies We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies.

⁰