Objective To make the detection on the reliability and validity of the Evaluation Scale of Patient-Reported-Outcome by windstroke patients with spastic paralysis.Methods The way of spot investigation was adopted.The windstroke patients with spastic paralysis were asked to fill in this questionnaire for two times with an interval of 2～3 weeks.Of the questionnaire collected back

those of 106 patients were valid ones.For reliability

the analyses were made on the split-half reliability and Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient.For validity

the analyses were made on the construct validity and differential validity.Results The total split-half reliability of the data of two times was 0.9047 and 0.9396 respectively

and the Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient 0.8741 and 0.9003 respectively.The dimensional reliability coefficients of somatization

mentation

and social communication were all higher than 0.75.As to construct validity

the factor analysis made the "subjective symptom"

"objective symptom"

"psychological feeling"

and "social communication" obtained.Except for the "social communication"

there were significant difference in other domains and total score of evaluation between the windstroke patients of spastic paralysis and flaccid paralysis

showing a certain differential effect.Conclusion This self evaluation scale owns a good reliability and validity

so it can be served as the tool for evaluating the clinical effect of windstroke patients with spastic paralysis.