TIAN Yuanxiang, WONG Weiliang, XIE Yanming, et al. The Construction and Weights of Midterm Evaluation Quantitative Indicators in TCM Clinical Research[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine2014, 55(11): 916-919.
TIAN Yuanxiang, WONG Weiliang, XIE Yanming, et al. The Construction and Weights of Midterm Evaluation Quantitative Indicators in TCM Clinical Research[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine2014, 55(11): 916-919.DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2014.11.005.
The hierarchical structure of midterm evaluation quantitative indicators in TCM clinical research was established according to the basic ideas of analytic hierarchy process( AHP) and the purpose and requirements of midterm evaluation. The midterm evaluation quantitative indicators were determined according to expert advice and joint inspection indicators. The multiplication method of combining weights was used to determine the subjective weights of indicators. The quantitative indicators were composed of 10 items such as included cases / total cases
recycling records of study drugs / drug-receiving records of subjects
unreasonable altered medical records
origin of physical and chemical testing
verifying the authenticity of subjects
signing informed consent
reporting electronic research data
completing the electronic data within a specified time window
checking the consistency of electronic case report forms and key indicators in medical record research and two-stage inspection. The normalized weights of these 10 items mentioned above were 0. 131