HUANG Weijun, ZHAO Jinxi, WANG Shidong, et al. Development of Wind Pathogen Syndrome Element Judging Expert Consensus in Chronic Kidney Diseases:Based on the Delphi Method[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine2017, 58(23): 2004-2007.
HUANG Weijun, ZHAO Jinxi, WANG Shidong, et al. Development of Wind Pathogen Syndrome Element Judging Expert Consensus in Chronic Kidney Diseases:Based on the Delphi Method[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine2017, 58(23): 2004-2007.DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2017.23.007.
Objective To develop the "Wind Pathogen Syndrome Element Judging Expert Consensus in Chronic Kidney Diseases"based on Delphi method. Methods Based on Delphi method
combining with the results of previous literature research
after two rounds of expert consultation
evaluated the results of expert advice from multiple aspects
including full mark rate
mean scores
variation coefficient and the coordination coefficient
then modified the items combined with clinical experience
and finally developed Wind Pathogen Syndrome Element Judging Expert Consensus in Chronic Kidney Diseases. Results Selected 20 domestic famous experts in total for a questionnaire survey. The expert authority score was 17. 9. The recovery rate of the questionnaire in the first round and the second round were 95. 24% and 75. 00% respectively. The overall coordination coefficient of the second round was 0. 348.According to the mean scores and variation coefficient of each item
combined with clinical experience
after appropriate deletion
determined the following 10 items: exogenous symptoms( such as sore throat) at acute stage or repeated attacks induced by external infection
a large number of bubbles in the urine
facial swelling
waist and knee pain
joint pain
dizziness and tinnitus
accompanied by skin rash
itching
aggravated condition and quickly changing condition induced by eating seafood. Conclusion Based on Delphi method
Wind Pathogen Syndrome Element Judging Expert Consensus in Chronic Kidney Diseases came into being. This scale represents most professors’ points of view
with a high degree of authority and good coordination.