1. 北京中医药大学针灸推拿学院
2. 中国中医科学院广安门医院
3. 中国中医科学院中医药信息研究所
4. 北京中医药大学针灸推拿学院中国中医科学院广安门医院中国中医科学院中医药信息研究所
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
[1]韩断,张红林,王晓玲,孙海舒.电针与单纯针刺治疗首发轻中度抑郁症临床疗效对比分析[J].中医杂志,2019,60(15):1304-1307.
HAN Duan, ZHANG Honglin, WANG Xiaoling, et al. Comparative Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of Electro-acupuncture and Simple Acupuncture in the Treatment of First-Episode Mild-to-Moderate Depression[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine2019, 60(15): 1304-1307.
[1]韩断,张红林,王晓玲,孙海舒.电针与单纯针刺治疗首发轻中度抑郁症临床疗效对比分析[J].中医杂志,2019,60(15):1304-1307. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2019.15.010.
HAN Duan, ZHANG Honglin, WANG Xiaoling, et al. Comparative Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of Electro-acupuncture and Simple Acupuncture in the Treatment of First-Episode Mild-to-Moderate Depression[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine2019, 60(15): 1304-1307. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2019.15.010.
目的比较电针和单纯针刺治疗首发轻中度抑郁症的临床疗效。方法将50例首发轻中度抑郁症患者随机分成电针组和针刺组各25例。两组针刺取穴相同
均为百会、四神聪、太阳(双侧)、印堂、合谷(双侧)。电针组于百会、印堂、太阳(双侧) 4穴接电针仪
频率为1 Hz
连续波。两组均每周治疗3次
持续6周
治疗后6个月进行随访。比较两组治疗前后汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分
随访时用HAMD进行评分。治疗后进行临床疗效评价。结果电针组最终纳入统计23例
针刺组最终纳入统计22例。电针组临床疗效总有效率为91. 3%
针刺组为68. 1%
两组总有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P=0. 16);两组治疗后HAMD总分及各因子评分均较本组治疗前降低(P <0. 05);两组睡眠障碍因子前后差值比较
差异有统计学意义(P=0. 01)。两组治疗后SDS评分均较本组治疗前降低(P <0. 05);两组SDS评分治疗前后差值比较
差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05)。治疗后及随访时两组间HAMD评分比较
差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05)。结论电针和单纯针刺治疗首发轻中度抑郁症疗效相当
且治疗后6个月疗效仍可以维持;在改善睡眠方面
电针更具有优势。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of electro-acupuncture and simple needling in the treatment of first-episode mild to moderate depression. Methods A total of 50 cases of first-episode mild to moderate depression were randomly divided into an electro-acupuncture group and an acupuncture group
with 25 cases in each group. Both groups selected same acupoints of Baihui(DU20)
Sishencong(EX-HN1)
Taiyang(EX-HN5)(bilateral)
Yintang(EX-HN3)
Hegu(LI4)(bilateral). For the electro-acupuncture group
Baihui(DU20)
Yintang(EX-HN3)
Taiyang(EX-HN5)(bilateral) were connected to an electro-acupuncture apparatus with a frequency of1 Hz and continuous wave. Both groups were treated 3 time per week
for 6 weeks and followed up after 6 months.The Hamilton depression scale(HAMD) and Self-rating depression scale(SDS) were compared before and after treatment. HAMD was scored during follow-up period. Clinical efficacy was evaluated after treatment. Results Totally 23 cases were included for statistical analysis in the electro-acupuncture group
and 22 cases were included in the acupuncture group. The total effective rate was 91. 3% in the electro-acupuncture group and 68. 1% in the acupuncture group. There was no statistical significance between groups(P = 0. 16). After treatment
the scores of HAMD and other factors scores in electro-acupuncture group and the acupuncture group were significantly decreased than before treatment(P < 0. 05). The comparison of sleep disturbance factor between groups before and after treatment was statistically significant(P = 0. 01). The SDS scores of the 2 groups were decreased than those before treatment(P < 0. 05). The comparison of SDS scores between groups before and after treatment showed no significant difference(P > 0. 05). There was no significant difference in HAMD scores between the 2 groups after treatment and at follow-up(P > 0. 05). Conclusion Electro-acupuncture and simple acupuncture are effective in treating firstepisode mild to moderate depression
and the effect can be maintained after 6 months of treatment. Electro-acupuncture is more advantageous in improving sleep.
0
浏览量
412
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010102007558号