1.湖南中医药大学中医诊断研究所,湖南省长沙市岳麓区含浦科教园学士路300号,410208
2.暨南大学中医学院
3.广州中医药大学基础医学院
003405@hnucm.edu.cn,(0731)88458217
收稿:2021-10-14,
修回:2022-05-06,
纸质出版:2022-08-17
移动端阅览
方格,周旋,陈家旭等.基于德尔菲法和层次分析法构建肝郁气滞证诊断量表[J].中医杂志,2022,63(16):1525-1531.
FANG Ge,ZHOU Xuan,CHEN Jiaxu,et al.Construction of Diagnostic Scale of Liver Constraint and Qi Stagnation Syndrome Based on Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process[J].Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2022,63(16):1525-1531.
方格,周旋,陈家旭等.基于德尔菲法和层次分析法构建肝郁气滞证诊断量表[J].中医杂志,2022,63(16):1525-1531. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2022.16.006.
FANG Ge,ZHOU Xuan,CHEN Jiaxu,et al.Construction of Diagnostic Scale of Liver Constraint and Qi Stagnation Syndrome Based on Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process[J].Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2022,63(16):1525-1531. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2022.16.006.
目的
2
初步构建肝郁气滞证诊断量表。
方法
2
检索数据库中国知网、维普、万方、SinoMed从建库之日至2020年10月31日,筛选有关肝郁气滞证的病因病机、危险因素、临床症状及体征的临床观察、专家经验类文献。通过前期文献系统评价、专家会议讨论和课题组进行中医名词整理,选择频次大于15的条目进入条目池。采用德尔菲法进行3轮专家咨询确定条目指标,结合层次分析法明确指标权重;用支持度、均数、满分比、等级和、不重要百分比、变异系数进行条目筛选,层次分析法计算的比重作为条目权重,形成肝郁气滞证诊断量表。
结果
2
共纳入分析文献98篇。构建的条目池有17个条目。3轮专家德尔菲法共收回有效问卷84份,总专家积极系数99%,权威程度系数均>0.8,协调系数分别为0.648、0.512、0.384。经支持度、均数、满分比、等级和、不重要百分比、变异系数统计,筛选出脉弦、胀满(闷)或胀痛或窜痛(胸胁、少腹、乳房等)、情志抑郁、脉沉弦、舌质淡红、苔薄白、遇情志不遂时易诱发或加重、急躁易怒、太息、咽部异物感、月经不调、痛经12个条目。层次分析法得到一级指标的比重由高到低的排序为:临床症状、脉象、舌象;二级指标的比重由高到低的排序分别为:脉弦、胀满(闷)或胀痛或窜痛(胸胁、少腹、乳房等)、情志抑郁、脉沉弦、舌质淡红、苔薄白、遇情志不遂时易诱发或加重、急躁易怒、太息、咽部异物感、月经不调、痛经。
结论
2
初步构建的肝郁气滞证诊断量表主要指标包括胀满(闷)或胀痛或窜痛(胸胁、少腹、乳房等)、脉弦,次要指标包括情志抑郁、遇情志不遂时易诱发或加重、舌质淡红、苔薄白、脉沉弦、急躁易怒、太息,其他指标包括咽部异物感、月经不调、痛经。
Objective
2
To preliminarily construct the diagnostic scale of liver constraint and
qi
stagnation syndrome.
Methods
2
The databases including CNKI, VIP, Wanfang and Sinomed were searched from the inception dates to October 31, 2020 for clinical studies exploring the etiology and pathogenesis, risk factors, clinical symptoms and signs of liver constraint and
qi
stagnation syndrome. Based on the previous systematic evaluation of medical literature, experts meeting, and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) terminology standardization, items with a frequency greater than 15 were selected to be an item pool. Delphi method was used for three rounds of consultation with experts to determine the items, and the weight of the items was determined by analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The level of support, mean value, full score ratio, grade sum, unimportant percentage and coefficient of variation were used to screen out the items, and the proportion calculated by AHP was used as the weight for each item to develop the diagnostic scale of liver constraint and
qi
stagnation syndrome.
Results
2
A total of 98 articles were included, and 17 items were obtained in the item. In the three rounds of Delphi survey, 84 valid questionnaires were collected, with 99% expert positive coefficient and the degree of authority coefficients > 0.8, and the coordination coefficient was 0.648, 0.512, and 0.384, respectively. After analyzing the level of support, mean value, full score ratio, grade sum, unimportant percentage and coefficient of variation, 12 items were selected including wiry pulse, distention (oppression) or distending pain or scurrying pain (of chest and rib-side, lesser abdomen, breast, etc.), emotional depression, deep wiry pulse, light red tongue, thin white coating, induced or aggravated in case of emotional distress, impatience and irascibility, sighing, globus pharyngeus, menstrual irregularities, and painful menstruation. The weights of the first level items obtained by AHP were ranked from high to low as follows: clinical symptoms, pulse manifestation, and tongue manifestation; the weights of second level items from high to low were: wiry pulse, distention (oppression) or distending pain or scurrying pain (of chest and rib-side, lesser abdomen, breast, etc.), emotional depression, deep wiry pulse, light red tongue, thin white coating, induced or aggravated in case of emotional distress, impatience and irascibility, sighing, globus pharyngeus, menstrual irregularities, and painful menstruation.
Conclusion
2
The preliminarily constructed diagnostic scale of liver constraint and
qi
stagnation syndrome is consisted of primary items including distention (oppression) or distending pain or scurrying pain (of chest and rib-side, lesser abdomen, breast, etc.) and wiry pulse, as well as secondary items including emotional depression, induced or aggravated in case of emotional distress, light red tongue, thin white coating, deep wiry pulse, impatience and irascibility, and sighing, and other items such as globus pharyngeus, menstrual irregularities, and painful menstruation.
李灿东 , 方朝义 . 中医诊断学 [M]. 北京 : 中国中医药出版社 , 2021 : 168 - 169 .
黄杨 . 基于文献及临床证据探究抑郁症中医辨证分型及其与客观指标的相关性研究 [D]. 天津 : 天津中医药大学 , 2021 .
马艳 , 余云飞 , 刘俊昌 . 乳癖消胶囊联合调和任冲推拿法治疗肝郁气滞型乳腺增生症的临床疗效观察 [J]. 中华中医药杂志 , 2020 , 35 ( 11 ): 5887 - 5890 .
王贵贤 , 常麦会 , 李庆丽 , 等 . 舒肝颗粒治疗围绝经期肝郁气滞型抑郁症的疗效观察 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2019 , 25 ( 6 ): 114 - 119 .
曹阳 , 余小萍 . PRO 量表国内外研究近况 [J]. 中医杂志 , 2014 , 55 ( 8 ): 710 - 714 .
李晓娟 , 陈家旭 , 刘玥芸 . 探讨证本质研究在完善中医辨证论治体系中的意义 [J]. 中华中医药杂志 , 2017 , 32 ( 6 ): 2353 - 2357 .
万崇华 , 禹玉兰 , 谭健烽 , 等 . 生命质量研究导论:测定·评价·提升 [M]. 北京 : 科学出版社 , 2016 : 34 - 54 .
谢蓉 , 连新福 , 周旋 , 等 . 基于层次分析法对冠心病痰瘀互结证辨证依据重要性评估探讨 [J]. 天津中医药 , 2019 , 36 ( 1 ): 23 - 26 .
刘小珍 , 陈泽奇 , 郭全 . 肝气郁结证证候量表的初步研究 [J]. 湖南中医药大学学报 , 2007 , 27 ( 1 ): 48 - 51 .
国家卫生健康委员会 , 国家中医药管理局 . 中医临床诊疗术语 第2部分:证候 [M]. 修订版.北京 : 中国中医药出版社 , 2020 : 298 .
陈家旭 , 邹小娟 . 中医诊断学 [M]. 3版 . 北京 : 人民卫生出版社 , 2016 : 132 - 143 .
李振吉 . 中医药常用名词术语辞典 [M]. 北京 : 中国中医药出版社 , 2001 .
中医研究院 , 广东中医学院 . 中医名词术语选释 [M]. 北京 : 人民卫生出版社 , 1973 .
邹积隆 . 简明中医病症辞典 [M]. 上海 : 上海科学技术出版社 , 2005 .
曾光 . 现代流行病学方法与应用 [M]. 北京 : 北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社 , 1996 : 253 - 254 .
杨思霞 , 曾奕 , 谢泽萍 , 等 . 基于德尔菲法和层次分析法构建阿尔茨海默病阴虚证评价体系 [J]. 中国医药导刊 , 2021 , 23 ( 2 ): 133 - 138 .
谢蓉 , 彭丹虹 , 王燕萍 , 等 . 基于德尔菲法探讨中医痰证辨证依据 [J]. 辽宁中医杂志 , 2017 , 44 ( 1 ): 16 - 20, 221 .
秦义 . 基于混合方法研究的肾阳虚证诊断标准的制定与评价 [D]. 北京 : 中国中医科学院 , 2020 .
黄剑阳 , 叶志松 , 钟森杰 , 等 . 心气虚证诊断条目筛选研究 [J]. 中医药导报 , 2019 , 25 ( 13 ): 8 - 12 .
申广生 . 皮肤黏膜淋巴结综合征中医诊疗指南研究 [D]. 南京 : 南京中医药大学 , 2011 .
朱克俭 . “ 以证为主、证病结合”的临床与科研思路 [J]. 湖南中医杂志 , 2017 , 33 ( 10 ): 1 - 3,6 .
赵晖 , 王筠 , 李淳 , 等 . 中医证候量表研制中的关键问题及其思考 [J]. 中国中医药信息杂志 , 2017 , 24 ( 6 ): 6 - 9 .
BOULKEDID R , ABDOUL H , LOUSTAU M , et al . Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review [J]. PLoS One , 2011 , 6 ( 6 ): e20476 .
HASSON F , KEENEY S , MCKENNA H . Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique [J]. J Adv Nurs , 2000 , 32 ( 4 ): 1008 - 1015 .
DIAMOND I , GRANT R , FELDMAN B , et al . Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodolo-gic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies [J]. J Clin Epidemiol , 2014 , 67 ( 4 ): 401 - 409 .
THOMPSON M . Considering the implication of variations within Delphi research [J]. Fam Pract , 2009 , 26 ( 5 ): 420 - 424 .
ESCOBAR A , QUINTANA J , ARÓSTEGUI I , et al . Development of explicit criteria for total knee replacement [J]. Int J Technol Assess Health Care , 2003 , 19 ( 1 ): 57 - 70 .
JONES J , HUNTER D . Consensus methods for medical and health services research [J]. BMJ , 1995 , 311 ( 7001 ): 376 - 380 .
陈园园 , 朱滨海 , 唐大龙 . 应用德尔菲法构建三级综合性医院医教研综合质量评价指标体系 [J]. 中国医院 , 2015 , 19 ( 4 ): 35 - 37 .
赵雨薇 , 郭蕾 , 张俊龙 , 等 . 应用德尔菲法构建中医适宜技术评估指标模型 [J]. 中华中医药杂志 , 2016 , 31 ( 6 ): 2257 - 2259 .
IMPROTA G , PERRONE A , RUSSO M , et al . Health technology assessment (HTA) of optoelectronic biosensors for oncology by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Likert scale [J]. BMC Med Res Methodol , 2019 , 19 ( 1 ): 140 .
朱燕波 , 王琦 , 史会梅 , 等 . 中医体质量表30条目简短版的制定与评价 [J]. 中医杂志 , 2018 , 59 ( 18 ): 1554 - 1559 .
王琦 , 朱燕波 , 薛禾生 , 等 . 中医体质量表的初步编制 [J]. 中国临床康复 , 2006 , 10 ( 3 ): 12 - 14 .
王少卿 , 刘强 , 高颖 . 气虚血瘀证诊断量表编制研究 [J]. 中华中医药杂志 , 2021 , 36 ( 11 ): 6563 - 6566 .
0
浏览量
6
下载量
8
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010102007558号