1.湖南中医药大学,湖南省长沙市岳麓区含浦科教园学士路300号,410208
2.湖南中医药大学第一附属医院
515800272@ qq.com
收稿:2022-11-01,
修回:2023-03-25,
纸质出版:2023-07-02
移动端阅览
蒋浩波,刘恩旭,廖晓倩等.乳腺纤维腺瘤肝郁气滞证中医诊断量表的效度与信度分析[J].中医杂志,2023,64(13):1330-1335.
JIANG Haobo,LIU Enxu,LIAO Xiaoqian,et al.Validity and Reliability Test of Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnostic Scale for Liver Constraint and Qi Stagnation Syndrome of Breast Fibroadenoma[J].Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2023,64(13):1330-1335.
蒋浩波,刘恩旭,廖晓倩等.乳腺纤维腺瘤肝郁气滞证中医诊断量表的效度与信度分析[J].中医杂志,2023,64(13):1330-1335. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2023.13.008.
JIANG Haobo,LIU Enxu,LIAO Xiaoqian,et al.Validity and Reliability Test of Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnostic Scale for Liver Constraint and Qi Stagnation Syndrome of Breast Fibroadenoma[J].Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2023,64(13):1330-1335. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2023.13.008.
目的
2
评价乳腺纤维腺瘤肝郁气滞证中医诊断量表的信度及效度。
方法
2
使用前期研究构建的含有12个证候条目的肝郁气滞证中医诊断量表,对125例乳腺纤维腺瘤患者进行量表调查,通过结构效度、聚敛效度、区分效度分析量表的效度;通过内部一致性信度、分半信度、重测信度评价量表信度。
结果
2
发放量表125份,剔除量表条目总完成度低于90%的量表4份,共回收121份有效量表,有效回收率为96.8%。量表的测评时间为(7.96±0.34) min,纳入量表条目无缺失值。结构效度分析结果显示,探索性因子分析中抽取3个公因子时达到最大总方差解释为59.479%,设置排除因子载荷系数绝对值≥0.5,将该量表分为3个维度,即主症、次症、舌脉;验证性因子分析中卡方值/自由度值(χ
2
/df)为1.075(<3),近似误差均方根(RMSEA)为0.025(<0.05);拟合优度指数(GFI)为0.925,比较拟合优度指数(CFI)为0.990,递增拟合指数(IFI)为0.990,Tucker-Lewis指数(TLI)为0.987,均>0.9。聚敛效度分析结果显示,所有条目因子载荷均>0.5,各维度平均方差提取值均>0.4、组合信度均>0.7。区分效度分析结果显示,三因子结构方程模型的拟合指数较二因子模型、单因子模型良好(
P
<0.01)。信度检验结果显示,量表总体内部一致性系数为0.830,总体分半信度系数为0.784,总体重测信度为0.929。
结论
2
乳腺纤维腺瘤肝郁气滞证中医诊断量表具有良好的信度及效度,能够满足临床诊断使用的实际需求。
Objective
2
To evaluate the reliability and validity of the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) diagnostic scale for liver constraint and
qi
stagnation syndrome of breast fibroadenoma.
Methods
2
A total of 125 patients with breast fibroadenoma were investigated by using the TCM diagnostic scale for liver constraint and
qi
stagnation syndrome with 12 syndrome items. The validity of the scale was tested by structural validity, convergence validity and discriminant validity analysis. The internal consistency reliability, split-half reliability and retest reliability of the scale were calculated to evaluate the reliability.
Results
2
Of all 125 questionnaires, four with completion rate less than 90% were excluded, and 121 questionnaires were valid, with an effective recovery rate of 96.8%. The completion time of the scale questionnaire was 7.96 ± 0.34 minutes, and there was no missing item values of the included questionnaires. Structural validity analysis showed that the maximum cumulative variance contribution rate was 59.479% when three common factors were extracted in the exploratory factor analysis; the absolute value of the exclusion factor load coefficient was set as ≥0.5, and then the scale could be divided into three dimensions, namely primary symptoms, secondary symptoms, and tongue and pulse. In terms of confirmatory factor analysis, the chi-square value/ degree of freedom (χ
2
/ df) was 1.075 (<3), and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was 0.025 (<0.05); the goodness-of-fit index (GFI) was 0.925, and the comparative goodness-of-fit index (CFI) was 0.990, while the incremental goodness-of-fit index (IFI) was 0.990, the Tucker-Lewis (TLI) was 0.987, and all values were greater than 0.9. Convergence validity analysis showed that all items factor loadings were greater than 0.5, with the average variance extraction values greater than 0.4, and the combined reliability greater than 0.7. The discriminant validity analysis showed that three-factor model fitting index was better than that of two-factor and single-facotr models (
P
<0.01). The overall internal consistency coefficient of the diagnostic scale was 0.830, and the total split-half reliability coefficient was 0.784, with the total test-retest reliability of 0.929 through reliability test.
Conclusion
2
The TCM diagnostic scale for liver constraint and
qi
stagnation syndrome of breast fibroadenoma has good reliability and validity, which can meet the actual needs of clinical diagnosis.
中华预防医学会妇女保健分会乳腺保健与乳腺疾病防治学组 . 乳腺纤维腺瘤诊治专家共识 [J]. 中国实用外科杂志 , 2016 , 36 ( 7 ): 752 - 754 .
ZHU L , ZENG X , JIANG S , et al . Prevalence of breast fibroadenoma in healthy physical examination population in Guangdong province of China: a cross-sectional study [J]. BMJ Open , 2022 , 12 ( 6 ): e057080 . doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057080 .
廖润泉 . 外科学 [M]. 贵阳 : 贵州科技出版社 , 2000 : 242 .
顾乃强 , 唐汉钧 , 潘群 . 实用中医乳房病学 [M]. 上海 : 上海科学技术出版社 , 1993 : 231 - 233 .
方格 , 周旋 , 陈家旭 , 等 . 基于德尔菲法和层次分析法构建肝郁气滞证诊断量表 [J]. 中医杂志 , 2022 , 63 ( 16 ): 1525 - 1531 .
PENG Y , XIE F , ZHAO Y , et al . Clinical practice guideline for breast fibroadenoma:Chinese Society of Breast Surgery (CSBrS) practice guideline 2021 [J]. Chin Med J (Engl) , 2021 , 134 ( 9 ): 1014 - 1016 .
赵尚华 . 中医外科学 [M]. 北京 : 人民卫生出版社 , 2002 : 130 .
肖顺贞 . 临床科研设计 [M]. 北京 : 北京大学医学出版社 , 2003 : 66 .
赵艳玲 , 张志芳 . 国家标准中医临床诊疗术语 证治要览 [M]. 长沙 : 湖南科学技术出版社 , 1999 .
邹积隆 , 丛林 , 杨振宁 . 简明中医病证辞典 [M]. 上海 : 上海科学技术出版社 , 2005 .
李振吉 . 中医药常用名词术语辞典 [M]. 北京 : 中国中医药出版社 , 2001 .
郑筱萸 . 中药新药临床研究指导原则(试行) [M]. 北京 : 中国医药科技出版社 , 2002 : 238 - 253 .
陈希镇 . 现代统计分析方法的理论和应用 [M]. 北京 : 国防工业出版社 , 2016 : 222 .
林海明 , 杜子芳 . 主成分分析综合评价应该注意的问题 [J]. 统计研究 , 2013 , 30 ( 8 ): 25 - 31 .
付会斌 , 孔丹莉 , 潘海燕 , 等 . 非线性结构方程模型的研究进展 [J]. 中国卫生统计 , 2010 , 27 ( 1 ): 101 - 103 .
吴明隆 . 结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用 [M]. 重庆 : 重庆大学出版社 , 2010 .
吴明隆 . 结构方程模型:Amos实务进阶 [M]. 重庆 : 重庆大学出版社 , 2013 .
李灿 , 辛玲 . 调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究 [J]. 中国卫生统计 , 2008 , 25 ( 5 ): 541 - 544 .
罗伯特·J·格雷戈里 . 心理测量历史、原理及应用 [M].施俊琦,译. 北京 : 机械工业出版社 , 2013 : 91 - 93 .
KOO TK , LI MY . A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research [J]. J Chiropr Med , 2016 , 15 ( 2 ): 155 - 163 .
刘成 , 钟海桥 , 王小芳 , 等 . 基于SWOT分析的中医药文化对外传播策略探析 [J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志 , 2022 , 28 ( 1 ): 114 - 116,137 .
GLUUD C . 循证医学的临床实践 [J]. 武燕萍 ,高国福,译.中国医学科学院学报, 2002 , 24 ( 6 ): 541 - 547 .
罗伯特·F·德威利斯 . 量表编制 理论与应用 [M].魏勇刚,龙长权,宋武,译. 重庆 : 重庆大学出版社 , 2004 : 54 - 63 .
吴明隆 . SPSS统计应用实务 [M]. 北京 : 中国铁道出版社 , 2000 : 47 .
0
浏览量
5
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010102007558号