1.中国中医科学院西苑医院,北京市海淀区西苑操场路1号,100091
2.山西中医药大学
3.山东中医药大学
jin_zhang2000@hotmail.com
收稿:2023-06-20,
修回:2023-08-24,
纸质出版:2023-12-02
移动端阅览
李纪新,邱林杰,任燕等.基于德尔菲法和层次分析法的中医食养药膳评价指标体系的初步构建[J].中医杂志,2023,64(23):2412-2418.
LI Jixin,QIU Linjie,REN Yan,et al.Preliminary Construction of Evaluation Index System for Traditional Chinese Medicine Medicated Diet based on Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process[J].Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2023,64(23):2412-2418.
李纪新,邱林杰,任燕等.基于德尔菲法和层次分析法的中医食养药膳评价指标体系的初步构建[J].中医杂志,2023,64(23):2412-2418. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2023.23.008.
LI Jixin,QIU Linjie,REN Yan,et al.Preliminary Construction of Evaluation Index System for Traditional Chinese Medicine Medicated Diet based on Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process[J].Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2023,64(23):2412-2418. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2023.23.008.
目的
2
构建中医食养药膳评价指标体系,推动中医药膳科学、规范发展。
方法
2
通过文献系统回顾、德尔菲专家咨询法构建中医食养药膳评价指标体系框架,运用层次分析法构建层次结构模型,Saaty1-9标度法进行指标间两两比较,Yaahp 10.3计算各指标权重。
结果
2
两轮专家咨询回收率分别为93.33%和100%;第二轮第一、二级指标肯德尔协调系数(Kendall's
W
)分别为0.270和0.281(均
P
<0.001);最终构建出包括6项一级指标,27项二级指标的中医食养药膳评价指标体系。一级指标及其权重为:感官形态(0.1843)、养生价值(0.3569)、成分配伍(0.1271)、包装(0.0370)、生产制作(0.1005)、可靠性(0.1940)。
结论
2
构建了一套普适性、综合性的中医食养药膳评价指标体系,同时兼顾色、味、形、效、制和质等多方面,可为食养药膳的价值测评及中医食养药膳的发展提供参考。
Objective
2
To build an evaluation index system for traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) medicated diet, promoting the scientific and standardized development of medicated diet in TCM.
Methods
2
The framework of the evaluation index system was constructed through literature review and Delphi expert consultation method. The analytic hierarchy process was used to construct a hierarchical structure model. Pairwise comparisons between the indicators were conducted using the Saaty 1-9 scale method, and the weight of each indicator was calculated using Yaahp 10.3.
Results
2
The response rates for the two rounds of expert consultation were 93.33% and 100%, respectively. The Kendall's
W
coefficients for the first-level and second-level indicators in the second round were 0.270 and 0.281, respectively (both
P
<0.001). Finally, an evaluation index system for TCM medicated diet therapy was constructed, consisting of 6 primary indicators and 27 secondary indicators. The weightings of the primary indicators were as follows: sensory appearance (0.1843), health value (0.3569), ingredient compatibility (0.1271), packaging (0.0370), production and preparation (0.1005), and reliability (0.1940).
Conclusion
2
A comprehensive and universally applicable evaluation index system for TCM medicated diet has been developed, taking into conside-rations of color, taste, appearance, efficacy, preparation, quality and others. This system can provide valuable reference for the evaluation of the value of medicated diet as well as its development.
AFSHIN A , FOROUZANFAR MH , REITSMA MB , et al . Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years [J]. N Engl J Med , 2017 , 377 ( 1 ): 13 - 27 .
YIN R , YIN L , LI L , et al . Hypertension in China: burdens, guidelines and policy responses: a state-of-the-art review [J]. J Hum Hypertens , 2022 , 36 ( 2 ): 126 - 134 .
GARCIA-CHAPA EG , LEAL-UGARTE E , PERALTA-LEAL V , et al . Genetic epidemiology of type 2 diabetes in mexican mestizos [J]. Biomed Res Int , 2017 , 2017 : 3937893 . doi: 10.1155/2017/3937893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/3937893 .
FERRERA MC , LABAKI WW , HAN MK . Advances in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [J]. Annu Rev Med , 2021 , 72 : 119 - 134 . doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-080919-112707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-080919-112707 .
MACHLOWSKA J , BAJ J , SITARZ M , et al . Gastric cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, classification, genomic characteristics and treatment strategies [J]. Int J Mol Sci , 2020 , 21 ( 11 ): 4012 .
LLOVET JM , KELLEY RK , VILLANUEVA A , et al . Hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers , 2021 , 7 ( 1 ): 7 .
BADE BC , DELA CC . Lung cancer 2020: epidemiology, etiology, and prevention [J]. Clin Chest Med , 2020 , 41 ( 1 ): 1 - 24 .
COLLABORATORS GD . Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017 [J]. Lancet , 2019 , 393 ( 10184 ): 1958 - 1972 .
FORD ES , BERGMANN MM , KROGER J , et al . Healthy living is the best revenge: findings from the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition-Potsdam study [J]. Arch Intern Med , 2009 , 169 ( 15 ): 1355 - 1362 .
DYSINGER WS . Lifestyle Medicine Prescriptions [J]. Am J Lifestyle Med , 2021 , 15 ( 5 ): 555 - 556 .
王明远 , 张帅 , 高云 , 等 . 中医食疗防治骨质疏松症的研究进展 [J]. 中国全科医学 , 2021 , 24 ( S2 ): 169 - 172 .
何丽 . 我国保健食品的现况、分类、管理及存在问题 [J]. 中华健康管理学杂志 , 2011 , 5 ( 6 ): 387 - 389 .
徐国祥 . 统计预测和决策 [M]. 上海 : 上海财经大学出版社 , 2016 : 8 - 10 .
GORDIJN SJ , BEUNE IM , THILAGANATHAN B , et al . Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol , 2016 , 48 ( 3 ): 333 - 339 .
王晶亚 , 宗星煜 , 王丁熠 , 等 . 中医药国际标准实施效果评价指标体系构建研究 [J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志 , 2023 , 29 ( 1 ): 99 - 103 .
张颖 , 季聪华 , 李秋爽 , 等 . 中医临床实践指南制修订中德尔菲法的统计分析方法 [J]. 中华中医药杂志 , 2018 , 33 ( 1 ): 249 - 251 .
毛歆 , 杨悦 , 张河战 . 医药卫生领域能力评价工具研究概述 [J]. 中国医药导报 , 2017 , 14 ( 25 ): 46 - 50 .
惠逸帆 , 程海波 , 李柳 , 等 . 《结直肠腺瘤中西医结合防治指南》临床问题与结局指标的确定 [J]. 中医杂志 , 2023 , 64 ( 11 ): 1100 - 1106 .
曹海霞 . 输液港护理质量评价指标体系的构建 [D]. 成都 : 电子科技大学 , 2022 .
LEAL JE . AHP-express: A simplified version of the analytical hierarchy process method [J]. MethodsX , 2020 , 7 : 100748 . doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.11.021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.11.021 .
史周华 . 预防医学 [M]. 北京 : 中国中医药出版社 , 2021 : 4 .
谢梦洲 . 中医药膳学 [M]. 北京 : 中国中医药出版社 , 2013 : 1 - 2 .
0
浏览量
17
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010102007558号