1.北京中医药大学研究生院,北京市朝阳区北三环东路11号,100029
2.中国中医科学院广安门医院
3.北京中医药大学深圳医院(龙岗)
4.山东中医药大学附属医院
drzhangpeitong@hotmail.com
收稿:2024-03-25,
修回:2024-07-30,
纸质出版:2024-11-17
移动端阅览
王菁,吴超勇,刘槟等.晚期胰腺癌不同中医证型及中药干预时间患者中位生存时间差异的回顾性分析[J].中医杂志,2024,65(22):2332-2337.
WANG Jing,WU Chaoyong,LIU Bin,et al.Analysis on the Difference of Median Survival Time of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Patients with Different Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndromes and Intervention Times of Chinese Herbal Medicine:A Retrospective Study[J].Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2024,65(22):2332-2337.
王菁,吴超勇,刘槟等.晚期胰腺癌不同中医证型及中药干预时间患者中位生存时间差异的回顾性分析[J].中医杂志,2024,65(22):2332-2337. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2024.22.009.
WANG Jing,WU Chaoyong,LIU Bin,et al.Analysis on the Difference of Median Survival Time of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Patients with Different Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndromes and Intervention Times of Chinese Herbal Medicine:A Retrospective Study[J].Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2024,65(22):2332-2337. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2024.22.009.
目的
2
观察晚期胰腺癌患者中医证型分布情况并探讨不同证型及接受不同中药干预时间患者的中位生存时间差异。
方法
2
回顾性收集136例接受中药治疗≥3个月的晚期胰腺癌患者的临床资料,包括性别、年龄、家族史、吸烟史、饮酒史、发病部位、淋巴结转移、多发远处转移、西医治疗方法、中医诊疗信息、生存时间等,使用乘积极限法(KM)进行分析,计算患者中位生存时间。对患者进行中医证型判定,归纳出主要单证分型和复合证型,比较不同复合证型患者中位生存时间差异。再根据患者中药治疗时间分为中药治疗≥6个月组和中药治疗<6个月组,以中药干预是否超过6个月为分组变量,匹配变量为年龄、性别、家族史、吸烟史、饮酒史、发病部位、淋巴结转移、多发远处转移、手术、化疗、放疗,进行倾向性评分匹配,比较匹配前后两组患者中位生存时间差异。
结果
2
136例患者主要单证分型位居前5位的是脾气虚证、肝血瘀证、肝气滞证、脾湿证、肝热证,主要复合证型为肝郁脾虚血瘀证、肝胆湿热血瘀证、肝郁气滞脾虚证、脾胃阳虚血瘀证、脾虚湿热内蕴证。倾向性评分法匹配前和匹配后总体中位生存时间分别为12.47(7.70,17.10)月和13.77(8.83,17.20)月,且中药治疗≥6个月组中位生存时间均显著高于中药治疗<6个月组(
P
<0.05)。匹配前,136例患者中脾虚湿热内蕴证患者中位生存时间最长为16.23(14.17,19.40)月,脾胃阳虚血瘀证患者中位生存时间最短为7.33(5.80,12.83)月;中药治疗≥6个月组肝郁脾虚血瘀证、肝胆湿热血瘀证和脾胃阳虚血瘀证的中位生存时间高于中药治疗<6个月组(
P
<0.05)。匹配后,108例患者中脾虚湿热内蕴证中位生存时间最长为15.23(7.67,18.27)月,脾胃阳虚血瘀证中位生存时间最短为8.80(6.90,16.17)月;中药治疗≥6个月组肝胆湿热血瘀证和脾胃阳虚血瘀证中位生存时间高于中药治疗<6个月组(
P
<0.05)。
结论
2
中药治疗脾虚湿热内蕴证晚期胰腺癌患者预后较好,脾胃阳虚血瘀证晚期胰腺癌患者预后较差;中药治疗≥6个月可较好地改善肝胆湿热血瘀证、脾胃阳虚血瘀证等晚期胰腺癌患者的中位生存时间。
Objective
2
To observe the distribution of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome types in advanced pancreatic cancer patients, and explore the association between median survival time and different TCM syndromes and different intervention times of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM).
Methods
2
The clinical data of 136 advanced pancreatic cancer patients who have received CHM for more than 3 months were collected retrospectively, including gender, age, family history, smoking history, drinking history, location of disease, lymph node metastasis, multiple distant metastasis, western medicine treatment methods, TCM diagnosis and treatment information, and survival time. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimator was used, and the median survival time of patients was calculated. The TCM syndrome type of each patient was judged, and the main single syndrome types and compound syndrome types were summarized. The median survival time was compared among different compound syndrome types. The patients were further divided into the group of those having received CHM ≥6 months and those having received CHM <6 months. Whether receiving CHM ≥6 months was taken as the grouping variable, while the matching variables were age, gender, family history, smoking history, drinking history, location of disease, lymph node metastasis, multiple distant metastasis, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy when propensity score matching was performed, and the difference in median survival time between the two groups of patients before and after matching was compared.
Results
2
For 136 cases of advanced pancreatic cancer, the top five single syndromes were spleen
qi
deficiency, liver blood stasis, liver
qi
stagnation, spleen dampness, and liver heat. The main compound types were liver constraint, spleen deficiency and blood stasis syndrome, liver-gallbladder damp-heat and blood stasis syndrome, liver constraint,
qi
stagnation and spleen deficiency syndrome, spleen-stomach
yang
deficiency and blood stasis syndrome, and spleen deficiency and dampness-heat internal accumulation syndrome. The overall median survival time before and after matching was 12.47 (7.70,17.10) months and 13.77 (8.83,17.20) months, respectively, and was significantly higher in the group treated with CHM ≥ 6 months than that treated with CHM <6 months (
P
<0.05). Among the 136 patients before matching, the median survival time of patients with spleen deficiency and dampness-heat internal accumulation syndrome was longest [16.23 (14.17,19.40) months], while that of patients with spleen-stomach
yang
deficiency and blood stasis syndrome was the shortest [7.33 (5.80,12.83) months]. For patients with liver constraint, spleen deficiency and blood stasis syndrome, li
ver-gallbladder damp-heat and blood stasis syndrome, and spleen-stomach
yang
deficiency and blood stasis syndrome, those having received CHM ≥ 6 months have much longer median survival time than those having received CHM <6 months (
P
<0.05). Among the 108 patients after matching, the median survival time of those with spleen deficiency and dampness-heat internal accumulation syndrome was the longest [15.23 (7.67,18.27) months], while that of spleen-stomach
yang
deficiency and blood stasis syndrome was the shortest [8.80 (6.90,16.17) months]. For patients with liver-gallbladder dampness-heat and blood stasis syndrome and spleen-stomach
yang
deficiency and blood stasis syndrome, the median survival time was higher in the group treated with CHM ≥ 6 months treated with CHM <6 months (
P
<0.05).
Conclusion
2
After treatment with CHM, advanced pancreatic cancer patients with spleen deficiency and damp-heat internal accumulation had a better prognosis, while those with spleen-stomach
yang
deficiency and blood stasis had a worse prognosis. Treatment with CHM ≥ 6 months could extend the median survival of advanced pancreatic cancer patients with liver-gallbladder damp-heat and blood stasis syndrome and spleen-stomach
yang
deficiency and blood stasis syndrome.
ISLAMI F , WARD EM , SUNG H , et al . Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part 1: national cancer statistics [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst , 2021 , 113 ( 12 ): 1648 - 1669 .
SUNG H , SIEGEL RL , ROSENBERG PS , et al . Emerging cancer trends among young adults in the USA: analysis of a population-based cancer registry [J]. Lancet Public Health , 2019 , 4 ( 3 ): e137 - e147 .
XIA C , DONG X , LI H , et al . Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants [J]. Chin Med J(Engl) , 2022 , 135 ( 5 ): 584 - 590 .
OTTAIANO A , CAPOZZI M , DE DIVITIIS C , et al . Gemcitabine mono-therapy versus gemcitabine plus targeted therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized phase III trials [J]. Acta Oncol , 2017 , 56 ( 3 ): 377 - 383 .
WEISS GJ , BLAYDORN L , BECK J , et al . Phase Ⅰb/Ⅱ study of gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma [J]. Invest New Drugs , 2018 , 36 ( 1 ): 96 - 102 .
王馨慧 , 刘小英 , 付文胜 . 胰腺癌的中医药治疗研究进展 [J]. 中国中西医结合消化杂志 , 2022 , 30 ( 4 ): 303 - 307 .
中国临床肿瘤学会胰腺癌专家委员会 . 胰腺癌综合诊治中国专家共识(2014年版) [J]. 临床肝胆病杂志 , 2014 , 30 ( 10 ): 970 - 980 .
American Joint Committee on Cancer , American Cancer Society . AJCC cancer staging manual [M]. 8th ed . New York : Springer Verlag , 2016 : 983 .
万崇华 , 罗家洪 , 杨铮 , 等 . 癌症患者生命质量测定与应用 [M]. 北京 : 科学出版社 , 2007 : 339 .
沈晔华 , 刘鲁明 , 孟志强 , 等 . 清胰化积方为主综合治疗晚期胰腺癌64例生存分析 [J]. 中医杂志 , 2009 , 50 ( 1 ): 39 - 42 .
王笑丹 , 张培彤 . 中医证候分层诊断模式及标准初探 [J]. 中华中医药杂志 , 2017 , 32 ( 3 ): 1209 - 1213 .
SIEGEL RL , MILLER KD , WAGLE NS , et al . Cancer statistics, 2023 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin , 2023 , 73 ( 1 ): 17 - 48 .
高惠峰 , 陈颢 , 冯兰云 , 等 . 基于生存分析的清胰化积方干预晚期胰腺癌预后相关因素研究 [J]. 上海中医药杂志 , 2014 , 48 ( 6 ): 28 - 33 .
陈峥 . 147例晚期胰腺癌患者的临床特征及生存分析 [D]. 北京 : 北京中医药大学 , 2022 .
姜菊玲 , 刘瑞 , 程孟祺 , 等 . 256例晚期胰腺癌患者中医证素特征及南北差异分析 [J]. 中医杂志 , 2023 , 64 ( 6 ): 593 - 599 .
马少军 , 孔棣 . 胰腺癌中医证候规律研究 [J]. 辽宁中医杂志 , 2014 , 41 ( 10 ): 2075 - 2077 .
张杨 . 52 例胰腺癌中医证候特点分析的临床研究 [D]. 沈阳 : 辽宁中医药大学 , 2014 .
姚大鹏 , 张培彤 . 106例胰腺癌患者证候转归情况分析 [J]. 中医杂志 , 2016 , 57 ( 23 ): 2017 - 2020,2024 .
韦云 . 恶性肿瘤患者死亡时间与中医阴阳关系的研究 [J]. 北京中医药大学学报(中医临床版) , 2008 , 15 ( 3 ): 5 - 8 .
刘晓丹 , 高宏 , 唐广义 . 胰腺癌中医辨证分型与预后相关性探索 [J]. 山西中医 , 2018 , 34 ( 10 ): 44 - 46 .
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010102007558号