1.国家中医药管理局中医师资格认证中心,北京市西城区北三环中路3号,100029
2.北京大学全国医学教育发展中心
3.北京大学护理学院
jinaning@qq.com
收稿:2024-04-30,
修回:2024-07-04,
纸质出版:2024-11-17
移动端阅览
江哲涵,徐玲玲,潘姝丞等.大规模中医师考试评价中认知诊断模型的构建及应用[J].中医杂志,2024,65(22):2383-2388.
JIANG Zhehan,XU Lingling,PAN Shucheng,et al.Analysis and Assessment of a Large-Scale Traditional Chinese Medicine Examination Based on Cognitive Diagnostic[J].Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2024,65(22):2383-2388.
江哲涵,徐玲玲,潘姝丞等.大规模中医师考试评价中认知诊断模型的构建及应用[J].中医杂志,2024,65(22):2383-2388. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2024.22.017.
JIANG Zhehan,XU Lingling,PAN Shucheng,et al.Analysis and Assessment of a Large-Scale Traditional Chinese Medicine Examination Based on Cognitive Diagnostic[J].Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2024,65(22):2383-2388. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2024.22.017.
目的
2
采用认知诊断模型对中医师岗位胜任力第二阶梯考核理论考试进行分析,为大规模医学考试的认知诊断研究提供参考。
方法
2
选择2023年参加中医师岗位胜任力第二阶梯考核理论考试的16 310位考生作答情况开展认知诊断分析。检验拓广决定型输入噪声与门模型(G-DINA模型)和考试数据之间的拟合程度;在认知诊断框架下进行项目参数分析和信度分析;从不同层面综合分析考生的认知属性掌握情况。
结果
2
本研究中16 310名考生平均分数为(189.76±40.86)分,共有9994名考生通过了此次考试,通过率为61.28%。考试总题量300题,五个模块中中医基础考核频率最高(132题,占44%),其次是中医临床(87题,占29%)、西医基础(60题,占20%),中医经典(12题,占4%)和医学人文(9题,占3%)考核比例较少。模型拟合指标结果显示,G-DINA模型曲线下面积(AUC)为0.98,说明该模型与本研究数据拟合优秀。项目参数分析结果显示,300道测试题目认知诊断模型的所有区分度均大于0,平均区分度为0.25,整体题目区分度的表现良好。信度分析结果显示,测验水平分类准确率为0.75,属性水平分类准确率为0.83~0.99,表明G-DINA模型的属性分类准确度高。认知诊断分析结果显示,相较于未通过考试的考生,已通过考试的考生对于各模块认知属性的掌握比例更高。
结论
2
基于认知诊断的大规模中医考试分析,可为提高中医学人才教育和培养质量提供支撑。
Objective
2
To analyze the scores of the second-tier assessment on theory of competency of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) physicians based on cognitive diagnostic model, and to provide a reference for cognitive diagnostic studies of large-scale medical examinations.
Methods
2
Cognitive diagnostic analyses were conducted by selecting the responses of 16,310 candidates who took the theory examination of the second-tier assessment on the competency of TCM physicians in 2023. The degree of fit between the topological deterministic input noise and gate model (G-DINA model) and the examination data was examined; item parameter analysis and reliability analysis were conducted under the cognitive diagnostic framework; the candidates' mastery of cognitive attributes was comprehensively analysed at different levels.
Results
2
The mean score of 16,310 candidates in this study was (189.76 ± 40.86), and a total of 9,994 candidates passed this examination, with a pass rate of 61.28 %. The total number of questions in the examination was 300, and among the five modules, the frequency of assessment of TCM fundamentals was the highest (132 questions, 44%), followed by TCM clinic (87 questions, 29%), Western medicine fundamentals (60 questions, 20%), and TCM classics (12 questions, 4%) and medical humanities (9 questions, 3%) was less. The results of the model fit index showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of the G-DINA model was 0.98, indicating that the model fit the study data excellently. The results of item parameter analysis showed that all the discriminations of the cognitive diagnostic model for the 300 test questions were greater than 0, with an average discrimination of 0.25, and the overall performance of the question discriminations was good. The results of the reliability analysis showed that the test level classification accuracy was 0.75, and the attribute level classification accuracy was 0.83 to 0.99, indicating that the G-DINA model has high attribute classification accuracy. The results of the cognitive diagnostic analyses showed that the proportion of candidates who had passed the exam was higher for the cognitive attributes of each module compared to those who had not passed the exam.
Conclusion
2
The analysis of large-scale TCM examinations based on cognitive diagnosis can provide support for improving the quality of TCM talent education and cultivation.
新华社 . 中共中央 国务院印发《深化新时代教育评价改革总体方案》 [EB/OL]. ( 2020-10-13 )[ 2024-03-29 ]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-10/13/content_5551032.htm http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-10/13/content_5551032.htm .
李振 , 周东岱 . 基于学科知识图谱的智能化认知诊断评估方法 [J]. 现代教育技术 , 2022 , 32 ( 11 ): 118 - 126 .
徐敢 , 罗卫花 . 以医师资格考试制度为轴心的医教考协同发展政策探索:以中医执业医师资格考试为例 [J]. 中医教育 , 2024 , 43 ( 2 ): 35 - 40 .
国家中医药管理局 , 教育部 , 人力资源社会保障部 , 等 . 国家中医药局 教育部 人力资源社会保障部 国家卫生健康委《关于加强新时代中医药人才工作的意见》 [EB/OL]. ( 2022-04-08 )[ 2024-03-29 ]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-06/23/content_5697348.htm https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-06/23/content_5697348.htm .
汪大勋 , 高旭亮 , 蔡艳 , 等 . 一种广义的认知诊断Q矩阵修正新方法 [J]. 心理科学 , 2019 , 42 ( 4 ): 988 - 996 .
刘慧 , 李亚男 . 基于认知诊断理论的国际中文阅读测验Q矩阵的构建 [J]. 华文教学与研究 , 2023 ( 4 ): 68 - 76 .
范婷婷 , 孙波 , 曾用强 . 英语阅读测试中不同认知诊断模型比较研究 [J]. 中国考试 , 2023 ( 5 ): 53 - 61 .
BI X , WANG Y , LI M , et al . Validation of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram for predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in sentinel lymph node-positive breast-cancer patients [J]. Onco Targets Ther , 2015 , 8 : 487 - 493 . doi: 10.2147/OTT.S78903 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S78903 .
温忠麟 , 黄彬彬 , 汤丹丹 . 问卷数据建模前传 [J]. 心理科学 , 2018 , 41 ( 1 ): 204 - 210 .
IACONANGELO C . Uses of Classification error probabilities in the three-step approach to estimating cognitive diagnosis models [D]. New Brunswick NJ : Rutgers University , 2017 .
WANG W , SONG L , CHEN P , et al . Attribute-level and pattern-level classification consistency and accuracy indices for cognitive diagnostic assessment [J]. J Educat Measur , 2015 , 52 : 457 - 476 . doi: 10.1111/jedm. 12096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12096 .
杨志明 . 提高选择题区分度的若干方法 [J]. 教育测量与评价 , 2017 ( 2 ): 5 - 10 .
DE LA TORRE J . The generalized DINA model framework [J]. Psychometrika , 2011 , 76 ( 2 ): 179 - 199 .
MA W , DE LA TORRE J . GDINA: an R package for cognitive diagnosis modeling [J]. J Statist Software , 2020 , 93 ( 14 ): 1 - 26 .
DE LA TORRE J . An empirically based method of Q‐matrix validation for the DINA model: development and applications [J]. J Educat Measur , 2008 , 45 ( 4 ): 343 - 362 .
GEORGE AC , ROBITZSCH A . Validating theoretical assumptions about reading with cognitive diagnosis models [J]. Int J Test , 2021 , 21 ( 2 ): 105 - 129 .
张怡 . 基于认知诊断的学习测验开发、应用与启示:以Tatsuoka的分数减法测验为例 [J]. 教育测量与评价 , 2022 ( 5 ): 71 - 82 .
于胜君 , 龚张斌 , 项乐源 . 基于岗位胜任力的中医执业医师资格考试改革方向的思考 [J]. 中医药管理杂志 , 2023 , 31 ( 12 ): 61 - 63 .
涂冬波 , 蔡艳 , 戴海琦 . 基于 DINA 模型的 Q 矩阵修正方法 [J]. 心理学报 , 2012 , 44 ( 4 ): 558 - 568 .
喻晓锋 , 罗照盛 , 秦春影 , 等 . 基于作答数据的模型参数和 Q 矩阵联合估计 [J]. 心理学报 , 2015 , 47 ( 2 ): 273 .
汪文义 , 宋丽红 , 丁树良 . 基于探索性因素分析的Q矩阵标定方法 [J]. 江西师范大学学报: 自然科学版 , 2015 , 39 ( 2 ): 138 - 144 .
DE LA TORRE J , DER ARK LAVAN , ROSSI G . Analysis of clinical data from a cognitive diagnosis modeling framework [J]. Measur Evaluat Counsel Develop , 2018 , 51 ( 4 ): 281 - 296 .
赵娅玲 , 郭晓梅 , 杨若俊 , 等 . 中医执业医师资格考试通过率较低的原因及对策 [J]. 中国中医药现代远程教育 , 2021 , 19 ( 14 ): 192 - 194 .
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010102007558号