1.新疆维吾尔自治区中医医院/新疆医科大学第四附属医院,新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市沙依巴克区黄河路116号,830000
2.马来西亚泰莱大学医学科学院
3.新疆医科大学第五附属医院
4.上海市中医医院
284712364@qq.com
收稿:2025-04-17,
修回:2025-07-04,
纸质出版:2025-09-17
移动端阅览
向兴刚,马震,张燕等.基于整合中医辨证分型与现代医学指标的蛛网膜下腔出血预后风险评估模型的构建[J].中医杂志,2025,66(18):1916-1924.
XIANG Xinggang,MA Zhen,ZHANG Yan,et al.Construction of a Prognosis Risk Assessment Model for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Based on the Integration of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome Differentiation and Modern Medical Indicators[J].Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2025,66(18):1916-1924.
向兴刚,马震,张燕等.基于整合中医辨证分型与现代医学指标的蛛网膜下腔出血预后风险评估模型的构建[J].中医杂志,2025,66(18):1916-1924. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2025.18.011.
XIANG Xinggang,MA Zhen,ZHANG Yan,et al.Construction of a Prognosis Risk Assessment Model for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Based on the Integration of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome Differentiation and Modern Medical Indicators[J].Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2025,66(18):1916-1924. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2025.18.011.
目的
2
构建基于整合中医辨证分型与现代医学指标的蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)预后风险评估模型,并验证其预测效能。
方法
2
回顾性收集SAH患者342例,按7∶3比例随机分为训练组(240例)和验证组(102例),并对两组患者进行中医辨证分型。根据90 d改良Rankin量表(MRS)评分将两组患者分为预后良好组(MRS评分≤2分)和预后不良组(MRS评分>2分)。采用回归分析确定预后独立危险因素,将差异有统计学意义(
P
<0.05)的因素纳入多因素Logistic回归分析确定预后独立危险因素,基于回归系数构建Logistic回归预测模型,利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、校准曲线及Bootstrap法内部验证评估模型性能。
结果
2
Hunt-Hess分级(
OR
=2.763,95%
CI
:1.872,4.075,
P
<0.001)、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分(
OR
=0.782,95%
CI
:0.681,0.897,
P
=0.001)、动脉瘤大小(
OR
=1.253,95%
CI
:1.056,1.487,
P
=0.010)、痰热瘀阻证(
OR
=3.214,95%
CI
:1.764,5.856,
P
<0.001)及气虚血瘀证(
OR
=2.457,95%
CI
:1.349,4.478,
P
=0.003)为SAH患者预后不良的独立危险因素。基于上述因素构建的Logistic回归预测模型在训练组中表现优异[曲线下面积(AUC)=0.862,95%
CI
:0.813,0.911],验证组中亦显示良好预测能力(AUC=0.843,95%
CI
:0.769,0.917)。校准曲线显示模型预测与实际观察结果高度一致(Hosmer-Lemeshow检验,
P
=0.713)。
结论
2
本研究成功构建并验证了SAH预后风险Logistic回归预测模型,该模型具有良好的预测性能,可为SAH临床个体化干预提供理论依据。
VAN GIJN J , KERR RS , RINKEL GJ . Subarachnoid haemorrhage [J]. Lancet , 2007 , 369 ( 9558 ): 306 - 318 .
DE ROOIJ NK , LINN FH , VAN DER PLAS JA , et al . Incidence of subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review with emphasis on region, age, gender and time trends [J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry , 2007 , 78 ( 12 ): 1365 - 1372 .
CLAASSEN J , PARK S . Spontaneous subarachnoid hae-morrhage [J]. Lancet , 2022 , 400 ( 10355 ): 846 - 862 .
ROSEN DS , MACDONALD RL . Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales: a systematic review [J]. Neurocrit Care , 2005 , 2 ( 2 ): 110 - 118 .
JR ESC , RABINSTEIN AA , CARHUAPOMA JR , et al . Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association [J]. Stroke , 2012 , 43 ( 6 ): 1711 - 1737 .
GERMANS MR , COERT BA , VANDERTOP WP , et al . Time intervals from subarachnoid hemorrhage to rebleed [J]. J Neurol , 2014 , 261 ( 7 ): 1425 - 1431 .
JAJA BNR , CUSIMANO MD , ETMINAN N , et al . Clinical prediction models for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review [J]. Neurocrit Care , 2013 , 18 ( 1 ): 143 - 153 .
李振华 , 王新俊 . 中医药治疗蛛网膜下腔出血研究进展 [J]. 中医杂志 , 2019 , 60 ( 16 ): 1421 - 1424 .
程国彭 . 医学心悟 [M]. 田代华,整理. 北京 : 人民卫生出版社 , 2006 : 127 - 129 .
朱文锋 . 中医诊断学 [M]. 北京 : 中国中医药出版社 , 2010 : 25 - 27 .
刘保延 , 王永炎 , 高颖 . 中医证候与脑出血患者预后关系的临床研究 [J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志 , 2011 , 17 ( 2 ): 165 - 167 .
张明 , 陈家旭 , 吴圣贤 , 等 . 中医证候评分对急性缺血性卒中预后评估的价值 [J]. 中国中西医结合杂志 , 2016 , 36 ( 2 ): 151 - 155 .
PEDUZZI P , CONCATO J , KEMPER E , et al . A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis [J]. J Clin Epidemiol , 1996 , 49 ( 12 ): 1373 - 1379 .
STEYERBERG EW . Clinical prediction models: a practical approach to development, validation, and updating [M]. New York : Springer , 2019 : 115 - 126 .
World Health Organization . The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines [M]. Geneva : World Health Organization , 1992 : 65 - 89 .
中国卒中学会 , 中国卒中学会脑血管病介入治疗专业委员会 . 蛛网膜下腔出血诊断与治疗指南(2019年版) [J]. 中华神经外科杂志 , 2019 , 35 ( 10 ): 1076 - 1083 .
国家中医药管理局 . 中医病证诊断疗效标准 [M]. 南京 : 南京大学出版社 , 1994 .
王永炎 , 魏江磊 . 中医脑病学 [M]. 北京 : 人民卫生出版社 , 2012 : 207 - 225 .
中华中医药学会 . 中医内科常见病证诊疗指南:脑病分册 [M]. 北京 : 中国中医药出版社 , 2011 : 78 - 91 .
SAVER JL , FILIP B , HAMILTON S , et al . Improving the reliability of stroke disability grading in clinical trials and clinical practice: the Rankin Focused Assessment (RFA) [J]. Stroke , 2010 , 41 ( 5 ): 992 - 995 .
HANLEY DF , THOMPSON RE , ROSENBLUM M , et al . Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery with thrombolysis in intracerebral haemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE Ⅲ): a randomised, controlled, open-label, blinded endpoint phase 3 trial [J]. Lancet , 2019 , 393 ( 10175 ): 1021 - 1032 .
GALLIFANT J , AFSHAR M , AMEEN S , et al . The TRIPOD-LLM reporting guideline for studies using large language models [J]. Nat Med , 2025 , 31 ( 1 ): 60 - 69 .
MOONS KG , ALTMAN DG , REITSMA JB , et al . Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration [J]. Ann Intern Med , 2015 , 162 ( 1 ): W1 - W73 .
STEYERBERG EW , HARRELL FE JR . Prediction models need appropriate internal, internal-external, and external validation [J]. J Clin Epidemiol , 2016 , 69 : 245 - 247 . doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.005 .
FELLER D , WINGBERMUHLE R , BERG B , et al . Improvements are needed in the adherence to the TRIPOD statement for clinical prediction models for patients with spinal pain or osteoarthritis: a metaresearch study [J]. J Pain , 2024 , 25 ( 11 ): 1 - 13 .
DELONG ER , DELONG DM , CLARKE-PEARSON DL . Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach [J]. Biometrics , 1988 , 44 ( 3 ): 837 - 845 .
TEASDALE GM , DRAKE CG , HUNT W , et al . A universal subarachnoid hemorrhage scale: report of a committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies [J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry , 1988 , 51 ( 11 ): 1457 - 1463 .
PAREKH A , SATISH S , DULHANTY L , et al . Clinical prediction models for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review update [J]. J Neurointerv Surg , 2023 , 12 ( 21 ): e021107 .
VERGOUWE Y , STEYERBERG EW , EIJKEMANS MJC , et al . Substantial effective sample sizes were required for external validation studies of predictive logistic regression models [J]. J Clin Epidemiol , 2005 , 58 ( 5 ): 475 - 483 .
JUVELA S , KORJA M . Intracranial aneurysm parameters for predicting a future subarachnoid hemorrhage: a long-term follow-up study [J]. Neurosurgery , 2017 , 81 ( 3 ): 432 - 440 .
SHAH I , CHEN PM , TRAN DKT , et al . Cerebral microdialysis demonstrates improvements in brain metabolism with cerebrospinal fluid diversion in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. Surg Neurol Int , 2023 , 14 : 395 . doi: 10.25259/SNI_679_2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_679_2023 .
JABBARLI R , REINHARD M , ROELZ R , et al . Early identification of individuals at high risk for cerebral infarction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: the BEHAVIOR score [J]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab , 2015 , 35 ( 10 ): 1587 - 1592 .
王国平 , 郑蕴峰 , 张洪亮 , 等 . 蛛网膜下腔出血患者预后相关因素分析及预测模型构建 [J]. 中华神经医学杂志 , 2020 , 19 ( 7 ): 707 - 713 .
池永奎 , 马兵 , 谢敏斌 , 等 . GCS评分对蛛网膜下腔出血患者预后预测价值的研究 [J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志 , 2019 , 45 ( 3 ): 168 - 172 .
郑鑫皓 , 陈文涛 , 崔轶轩 , 等 . 《备急千金要方》急重症诊疗思路与方法探析 [J]. 中华中医药杂志 , 2025 , 40 ( 1 ): 55 - 58 .
张国玲 , 李振华 , 周仲瑜 . 基于“毒损脑络”理论探讨痰瘀互结证在蛛网膜下腔出血中的病机研究 [J]. 辽宁中医药大学学报 , 2017 , 19 ( 11 ): 49 - 51 .
郭祥申 , 张晓玲 , 王新俊 , 等 . 不同中医证型脑出血患者血浆D-二聚体和纤溶酶原激活物抑制物-1水平的对比研究 [J]. 中国中西医结合杂志 , 2014 , 34 ( 9 ): 1059 - 1063 .
杨振奎 , 尹朝庆 , 王丹 , 等 . 基于中医证候的脑出血预后风险预测模型的构建 [J]. 中国中医急症 , 2018 , 27 ( 12 ): 2129 - 2132 .
李明 , 朱彦君 , 孙宏伟 , 等 . 整合中医证候的缺血性卒中预后预测模型研究 [J]. 中医杂志 , 2021 , 62 ( 5 ): 410 - 415 .
陈力 , 王永炎 , 张志强 , 等 . 蛛网膜下腔出血中医辨证分型与血管内皮功能的相关性研究 [J]. 中华中医药杂志 , 2020 , 35 ( 7 ): 3654 - 3658 .
刘艳 , 于亚丽 , 张效霞 , 等 . 脑出血不同证型与血流变学指标及炎症因子的相关性研究 [J]. 中医杂志 , 2018 , 59 ( 17 ): 1476 - 1480 .
HOH BL , KO NU , AMIN-HANJANI S , et al . 2023 Guideline for the management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association [J]. Stroke , 2023 , 54 ( 7 ): e314 - e370 .
0
浏览量
5
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010102007558号